Bolt action itīs non restricted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bolt action itīs non restricted
Bolt action WITH AR-lower is restricted, alberta tactifle rifle even made a ar-style lower for bolt upperOriginally Posted by David L
did you even look at the lower? It is clearly not an AR-15 Lower. However, I understand your point and that the RCMP willingly construes appearance and ergonomics to fit their political agenda. However, my money is on NR. What is the point otherwise?.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - When all else fails, vote from the rooftops "Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est"
How do you explain the restricted xbow with the ar lower......
Ar lower = restricted
Where does it say it uses an AR15 lower????
Last edited by andrew3081; 12-07-2013 at 02:16 PM.
What?
It dosnt,somebody asked if it was then people starting saying if its a bolt action the lower dosnt matter which as most educated folk know it does.
You are right: on the website it says ar-type lower. So restricted....
I'd have to say Non-res....no way a regular AR upper fits on that lower.
It's getting a little bit Sunday around here.....
Dlask arms made a pump action AR, it was restricted.............
If it's either loud, obnoxious, fast, hated by the general population or any combination of these, I OWN IT!!
Tag
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote