NEA 7.5" CCS in .300 Blackout - when available?

[Dude in G.P.]

Does SFRC know when the NEA 7.5" CCS in .300 blackout will be available?

I know the 5.56 version is available now, but have not been able to source .300 blackout for this barrel length. NEA's website pamphlet has .300 blackout listed as available as a 7.5" CCS model.

Any ideas of when this model will be available?

[loosegroup]

Like the sound of that!

[geclark]

You can always get there with a barrel swap, which is how I got mine. Not ideal, but only an extra $200 and change (+/- $40 for a new muzzle device).

The CCS in 300 BLK is a pretty sweet rig, until you run out of ammo!

[Dude in G.P.]

You can always get there with a barrel swap, which is how I got mine. Not ideal, but only an extra $200 and change (+/- $40 for a new muzzle device).

The CCS in 300 BLK is a pretty sweet rig, until you run out of ammo!

So you purchased a 5.56 CCS with 7.5" barrel then swapped the barrel out for a 7.5" .300blkout? If so, did you have to change the bolt carrier group spring to something heavier?

thanks!

Of course i still want to know from SFRC when the NEA factory CCS 7.5" in 300 blackout is coming.

[Dude in G.P.]

Well, obviously this is not high on SFRC's priority list.

[Chemist]

When NEA makes them, we'll sell them.

[geclark]

Yep. I didn't change the spring, though I'd say the stock spring that came with my CCS was pretty strong. I've only put 40 rounds through it though, so no while functionality is ok I can comment on reliability. Need more 300 BLK...

So you purchased a 5.56 CCS with 7.5" barrel then swapped the barrel out for a 7.5" .300blkout? If so, did you have to change the bolt carrier group spring to something heavier?

thanks!

Of course i still want to know from SFRC when the NEA factory CCS 7.5" in 300 blackout is coming.

[Dude in G.P.]

When NEA makes them, we'll sell them.

Thank you for your response. I had brought up the question because NEA's website states (on the data sheet for the CCS) that 300AAC is one of the calibers used.

I guess NEA hasn't got that far on it.

Again, thank you.