Well worded Jay.
Well worded Jay.
CQB, 3 Gun, ISSAC and Service Rifle Shooter.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - 1* - SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM - HAN SHOT FIRST - YOUR FREEDOM IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
i will be honest dont really understand all that mumbo jumbo but i get enough of it to say that i dont think its the solution
Strike swiftly and return to the shadows
How long will they let john be a member? Who would appoint John? Who could kick him out?
John would become another bureaucrat in the system. As easy to appoint as any other, and as easy to remove. New election, liberals or NDP are in and John is out. The new appointment would be liberal stooges and the "conservative" established panel would be no more. Then the liberals could change everything and say they are a separate, independent panel. Plausible deniability for actions taken by the panel. Sound like the current CFO system?
No. Not signing.
CQB, 3 Gun, ISSAC and Service Rifle Shooter.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - 1* - SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM - HAN SHOT FIRST - YOUR FREEDOM IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
Signed and forwarded to all of my contacts
This does not change the fact that many (and one day all) firearms owners are considered criminals and threats to public security without having done anything. Draft something that prevents me from becoming a criminal for merely owning firearms and I will sign it.
I think Mrs Cheryl Gallant is trying to make up for the bone head comments she made about veterans with PTSD.
Rather than the RCMP and the Ontario Forensic department, I would prefer to see a national statistician or even an actuary who could shed light on projected safety concerns based on collected data. IE. incident reports, crimes committed, etc. I would guess that with current Canadian data, there would be little to support the restriction of most if not all firearms.