Originally Posted by
BPM
You are correct, generally you get what you pay for. That said, I am trained on the duty use of a C8 rifle, and must requalify on it to maintain active service, and we do not have optics, and must shoot in the 9 ring at 100m to maintain proficiency. I can do this with the Colt Canada C8, and I can do this with my Norinco (DA556 from another sponsor but basically ther same). Is the Norinco equal to the Colt, no, however, it's a quarter the price. Annnnnd, it's funny, but that god damn thing shoots every bit as well at 100m using the same ammo. So half of me is shocked, and the other half is proud, that a gun so inexpensive is surprizingly well built (I've stripped both, the Commy gun is no slouch and not full of rough aluminum filings and lubed with the tears of chinese babies) and has had zero ftf or any stoppage whatsoever, when I've had 5 that I can recall in the past year alone with the C8, and I hardly ever get range time on that.
Just my thoughts on the topic of Norinco bashing as a whole, and to play the Devils Advocate, as it gets pretty tiring hearing people consistantly bash the Norincos because quite frankly, most of the time (generalizing here) they are butthurt their $1k, $2k, $3k+ 'Merica Built AR System is being threatened by "another kid and his Cheapo Norinco", and all of a sudden what used to be some superficial, arrogant "elitist" club is now in the affordability of your average shooter. Trust me, I know, I was there once. Then I grew up and realized that the more people that shoot, the better off this sport is in regards to our country and it's draconian laws.