 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
I did a search around the web, I do not think it does. The take down pins seem to be different and the MR308A3 lower uses proprietary mags.Originally Posted by Donster 125
Someone with more experience with an HK can answer this....
I know that MR223 uppers can match with other AR15 lowers though
The .308 with a 20 inch barrel is Non restricted right?
It is still restricted because it's an AR style rifle.
My bad sorry! but the FDE is Awesome! and German !
Agreed! Though I think for the money, I can grab a C8 and a G36 once they're released to Canada
Last edited by Donster 125; 07-22-2014 at 02:53 PM. Reason: fixed my ####ty grammar
![-[Crosshair]-'s Avatar](image.php?s=5ecf5cf04264eaacc14591988d81d3f9&u=31565&dateline=1330644210 "-[Crosshair]-'s Avatar")
I like how a standard magazine well that accepts STANAG magazines (that should be standard on every AR-15 ever) is a "modified magazine well" for H&K. There is no smiley to demonstrate how fast my eyes are rolling at this.
IF The BushMaster ACR DMR is not restricted ....why the HK?
The original Magpul Pmags were not to Stanag dimensions that is why Hk never considered making there magwell to those dimensions, The Pmag actually came after the HK416 so it was not known.
Because the ACR is NOT an AR patterned variant... the lower receiver is not like an AR at all nor is the action.IF The BushMaster ACR DMR is not restricted ....why the HK?
Yes we all know this is BS.... AR is restricted due to appearance... not dimensions and function.... uneducated politicians making laws.
i was totally gutted when i found out the rifle was restricted and couldnt use it for hunting
typical British wankers
Posting Permissions
