The PCV .50 Beowulf Magazine are back in stock at High Caliber.

[spellbound]

So you modified a magazine for a .50 firearm to fit and function in a .223/556 gun. That's called manufacturing a prohibited device.

####! Everyone, hide! The RC's are here!

[Deuce-deuce]

####! Everyone, hide! The RC's are here!

You've clearly missed the point.

[CraigNConnor]

So you modified a magazine for a .50 firearm to fit and function in a .223/556 gun. That's called manufacturing a prohibited device.

You just went full retard.

[CraigNConnor]

Mostly the mag, but did a very little light sanding in the magwell as well.
Still doesn't drop free, but otherwise comes out easily enough.

He sanded a mag
Wow
Face palm @ deuce

[eatredmeat157]

Yeah the mag still only holds 5 rounds of the cartridge for which it was designed (.50 Beo) so it's not in any way prohibited, regardless what firearm it's used in (or modified to use in)

It would need the same sanding to work in a .50 Beo AR as the magwells are all mil spec? Just a thought

[StylinMike]

It would need the same sanding to work in a .50 Beo AR as the magwells are all mil spec? Just a thought

No, the T97's are known to have tighter magwells.

Out of curiosity, would someone be able to copy and paste the part of the firearms act that talks about magazine modification. I cant seem to find it. (And not the part about modifying magazines to hold less rounds through the use of pin etc.)

[eatredmeat157]

You can't find it because it isn't there.

Only modifying magazines for more/less capacity is covered.

[StylinMike]

You can't find it because it isn't there.

Only modifying magazines for more/less capacity is covered.

[eatredmeat157]

**not a lawyer***
***not intended as legal advice**

[JR Hartman]

its not a prohibited device now. just tweaking a mass produced part to fit another mass produced part. no changes of intent, no changes of capacity, no changes of cartridge type, not making it work with a prohib round, or in a prohib firearm.