Pro'sOriginally Posted by kagia
Keeps the weight down, reduces friction on the magazine going in and out, won't rust.
Con's
Fear of breaking plastic parts.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Pro's
Keeps the weight down, reduces friction on the magazine going in and out, won't rust.
Con's
Fear of breaking plastic parts.
Our Government trusts rivets more then law abiding gun owners.
Good to know, thanks. I know that's the case with tube magazines, just wasn't sure whether shorter shells would be an issue with the detachable box mags.
Damn, my willpower is slipping. Sometimes I really regret joining this site.
Charles
Good point on the Box Mag...... I was thinking only of the chamber!
I guess we will have to wait for the field reports.
Our Government trusts rivets more then law abiding gun owners.
still waiting on a reply back from TI on this gun.
If we can get one of these I can tell you what parts, work on it and what aftermarket parts can be fitted
bbb
Judging by the pictures on page one, this shotgun will feed both 3" and 2 3/4. You can see the mags loaded with both sizes.
You can never be too rich, too good looking or too well armed!
In testing, the weapons grade fibre reinforced polymer mag well was shown to be more durable than the cast metal found in earlier prototypes
I do and it runs nice enough for me. Smooth and reliable, right from day one. It is heavy, but I prefer that for slugs, I bought a light Armed tube fed for being out in the woods and it's absolutely miserable to shoot slugs out of compared to the Grizz. It looks badass, and like I say, it was fully half the price. Plus 870 stuff bolts up to it.
Sorry that project is dead unfortunately
Yes, but unlike a Grizzly these seem to run well! A Grizzly is not a good deal at any price in my books.
I believe These shotguns are Coming outta the Same factory as the Derya arms shotguns. That Stock looks exactly like my Semi Auto Derya x2 shotgun.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
