Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 146

Thread: Incredible Stun Baton?

  1. #41
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer randyhub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    3,874
    Quote Originally Posted by Onagoth View Post
    Intent only matters if the statutory language us unclear.... There are rules of statutory interpretation
    From the Government, looks clear to me:

    Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 3

    6 Any device that is designed to be capable of injuring, immobilizing or incapacitating a person or an animal by discharging an electrical charge produced by means of the amplification or accumulation of the electrical current generated by a battery, where the device is designed or altered so that the electrical charge may be discharged when the device is of a length of less than 480 mm, and any similar device.
    Last edited by randyhub; 06-11-2016 at 04:36 PM.

  2. #42
    Pound of Fire
    Super Moderator
    Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    15,244
    Quote Originally Posted by canadiantbone View Post
    I had mine confiscated & am in the process of taking the officers to court to get it back. I am attaching the emails that I sent and received from the officer (here in Abbotsford). Hope this helps out anyone else :

    Hi Constable T,

    I'm not sure if you received my previous emails ; so I will repeat what was sent in them . I know that you are aware that Constable Moore confiscated my stun baton , citing that it was a prohibited weapon. I explained to him that in the 2016 Martins Annual Criminal Code(Canada law book) that on page 183, section 84 , FORMER Prohibited weapons order Part 3 , number 6 STATES :

    - 6 Any device that is designed to be capable of injuring, immobilizing or incapacitating a person or an animal by discharging an electrical charge produced by means of the amplification or accumulation of the electrical current generated by a battery, where the device is designed or altered so that the electrical charge may be discharged when the device is of a length of less than 480 mm, and any similar device..

    Even with this information , Constable Moore insisted that I was wrong & he would advise you & let me know his findings. I then received a phone call from Cst. Moore citing that you had confirmed that the stun baton was indeed a prohibited weapon. I have since checked with the R.C.M.P. & again with the current criminal Code & find both of you incorrect. Since then I have contacted Legal counsel & have been advised that neither you or Constable Moore have filed a 5.2 with the Provincial court of Abbotsford. I am hoping that you can admit your mistake & return my baton (in good working order) to avoid me having to proceed with further legal action.


    Thank you , T M cell

    P.S. The links below are to the site that I purchased the baton & the on line version of the criminal code. I also supplied you a copy of the information in this email & the dimensions of the baton in your mail slot at the Abbotsford Police department..

    http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/r.../FullText.html

    https://www.canadaammo.com/product/d...le-stun-baton/

    https://www.canadaammo.com/product/d...gel-stun-cane/

    His responce:

    Hello Mr M,

    On May 3rd, 2016 Cst Quaglia of the APD, a court expert with respect to non firearm prohibited weapons inspected the said weapon seized from you by Cst Moore on April 4th 2016. The seized weapon in question was a stun baton flashlight.

    Cst Quaglia provided a detailed written report; as a result of that report which cited excertpts of Legislation from the Criminal Code of Canada and open source information, his expert opinion based on his training and knowledge of Canadian Law with respect to non firearm prohibited weapons backed by his Court appointed "expert" designation, Cst Quaglia has determined the stun baton flashlight a prohibited weapon by definition of the Criminal Code of Canada.

    As you are most likely aware, anyone found in possession of a prohibited weapon in Canada is subject to arrest for several different criminal offences based on why it is in ones possession and why it was intended to be used or was used.

    Based upon the findings of Cst Quaglia, the stun baton flashlight will not be returned to you. The prohibited weapon will be retained by the APD for training and educational purposes to educate other police officers in the effort to continue to keep and maintain our community safety commitment.

    As per APD policy, I am not able to provide you with a copy of Cst Quaglia's report. If you should require a copy of that report you will need to apply for it through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOI). The APD front counter staff will be more than happy to assist you in that matter if required.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    With respect;

    Cst C T
    Abbotsford Police

    Thanks for your fairly quick response,

    but you still leave me with unanswered question. How do I get a copy of Cst Quaglia report ? Are you then going to put a stop to the importer of said devise ? If I go and purchase the stun/flashlight walking cane , is it also a prohibited devise? If I were to be in possession of a cattle prod , is that a prohibited device. It looks as though you are leaving me with no choice but to seek legal counsel on these matters & to proceed as needed.


    Thanks, T

    Hi T,

    I answered your question with respect to obtaining a copy of the report, you can apply for it through the FOI. With respect to the putting a stop to importing the device, that is a question you will have to ask CBSA and other government entities. As far as the other devices you mentioned, that would need to be investigated should one be seized from anyone and again an expert opinion would need to be sought.

    Please keep in mind that anything can be purchased on the internet from anywhere. The buyer of any item(s) must ensure that they conform with our Canadian laws and regulations if they are being brought into this country.

    Cst T
    Abbotsford Police
    Wow! So, they don't even bother to check the ACTUAL LAW that stipulates UNDER 480mm is prohibited... Sigh, what a gong show! I hope you continue to press them for the return of your legal property!

    Cheers
    Jay
    Wing Nut

    "No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson.

  3. #43
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    Posts
    815
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy-Smiley View Post
    Watch out guys!!!

    A person I know had TPS (police service) in their home on an unrelated matter and they charged him with having a prohibited weapon. They classified it as a Tazer Gun.

    He bought it good faith from the reputable company we all know.

    I would like to what a person in the legal field thinks of this!!!!
    It is the same as a cattle prod. The key to this statement is say nothing to the police as anything you do say will be distorted. Record all conversations with the police because of this. Hire a lawyer and get a written apology.

  4. #44
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    Posts
    815
    Quote Originally Posted by nelson View Post
    Not to be a downer here, as I love these canes and batons! But my friend got pulled over and searched today. They confiscated his stun canes and charged him with two counts of possession of prohibited weapons. I sure hope it is just a case of a misinformed officer. I will let you all know how he does in court.
    Was he charged or just arrested and items seized. I would be surprised if charges were laid. Not impossible but.

  5. #45
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer randyhub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    3,874
    And as if Canada Ammo would even be allowed to bring them in over and over again if they were illegal.....

    How can a Police Service put this in writing before confirming what is legal.

    Makes me just shake my head how a Police Force can feel confident in enforcing laws.............

  6. #46
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Onagoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    15,499
    Quote Originally Posted by randyhub View Post
    From the Government, looks clear to me:

    Former Prohibited Weapons Order, No. 3

    6 Any device that is designed to be capable of injuring, immobilizing or incapacitating a person or an animal by discharging an electrical charge produced by means of the amplification or accumulation of the electrical current generated by a battery, where the device is designed or altered so that the electrical charge may be discharged when the device is of a length of less than 480 mm, and any similar device.
    Then if you have been affected, file a lawsuit against the RCMP for damages and/or the return of property
    The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.

    - Richard Feynman

  7. #47
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer geologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lower Mainland, BC
    Posts
    21,130
    It shakes my confidence in the Abby police.
    "Conservation is the mark of a dying civilization. When your technology is not increasing at the same rate as your population growth you are done. Bring on the next contender.".

  8. #48
    CGN Regular Vex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    308
    I will neither confirm or deny I own both the cane and batton. Nor that while sitting in a metal lawn chair applied said device to my leg or that it was a particularly unpleasant experience preferably not repeated to the great amusement of any of the 5 onlookers that may or may not have been present.
    BANNING. When you're just not smart enough to offer a real solution.

  9. #49
    Newbie KnowledgeSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Peace River, Ab
    Posts
    3
    I don't really give a F***K the police say there's the law in black and white period! I'm buying one for my mom for her birthday and the "intent" is that if someone tries to harass her in any way when she goes out for her walks that she FRIES them in order to defend herself without hesitation and i want to see her empty the battery on the DIPS**T and I know she will!

  10. #50
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    Posts
    815
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay View Post
    Wow! So, they don't even bother to check the ACTUAL LAW that stipulates UNDER 480mm is prohibited... Sigh, what a gong show! I hope you continue to press them for the return of your legal property!

    Cheers
    Jay
    Police can seize anything indefinitely in the course of a criminal investigation. Your only recourse is to file a motion at a superior court. The criminal code allows for this. At that time the police would have to justify why they believe that the seizure is necessary. Considering the fact that the items are not illegal and that they have no intention to charge the individual I would think it would be hard to justify. Just a note if you file a motion you will make a few enemies in both the police department and the crownsuch office.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •