Looks like a very professional review to me...I think he works for them , and likes his job doing reviews so much that he may even work for free...or beer
Looks like a very professional review to me...I think he works for them , and likes his job doing reviews so much that he may even work for free...or beer
It seems you two are approaching this from different directions.
Tiriaq says if it is not banned by regulation, it must be allowed.
MC2 says that if it is not approved by regulation, it is not allowed yet.
I DONT have the final answer, but I'm leaning towards Tiriaq's understanding of it.
I'd like to emphasize this part of it again:
"Firearms are classified under the Criminal Code and its supporting regulations. As such the RCMP does not have the authority to classify firearms. However, in order to fulfill its statutory role of registering firearms, the RCMP must form an opinion as to the classification of a firearm if the classification is not explicitly set out in the Criminal Code and its supporting regulations. This expert technical opinion is captured in the FRT."
-RCMP Briefing Note to Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney
The firearm I was given met all the requirements laid out in the criminal code to be non-restricted.
"Instead of 'sewer,' I propose 'Trudeau.' Both terms describe massive deposits of human filth, and no person who knows what these terms describe would ever want to live under either one." ~Doc M
Originally Posted by cobalt545
Nice review, thanks
IMHO - I feel that it has the wrong furniture. The bend of old and new is not harmonious..
I'd buy one, but be looking for black pieces asap.
ITB
-CSSA-
-CCFR-
-NFA-
-CPC-
i want one!!
Would you be able in the future make a heavier fluted barrel for it? And maybe a SVD type flash hider for this and all the existing rifles.