Yeah, that is high, meaning you need to add a cheek rider pad and that probably will interfere with the straight pull bolt
Yeah, that is high, meaning you need to add a cheek rider pad and that probably will interfere with the straight pull bolt
Are these sold out? link does not work and can not find it on the site?
I used Weaver low rings to get the scope to sit as low as possible.
With the Blackhawk! cheek riser, it's just right for me.
No problems working the bolt or removing it with that riser. I have to push the front of the riser pad down a bit to pull the bolt out, but it's foam, so no problem.
I'll be shooting it again in a couple of days. I'll see how well it holds zero.
Yea, I tried to zero my scope and ran out of vertical adjustment on my scope and was still shooting 5 inches high at 100 ! So i got out the dremel and sanded down the U shaped block that rests on the receiver bringing down the rear of the base down a bit . Now im zeroed with adjustment to spare up and down . This should be addressed in any new production of these, might not be a issue with a 30mm tube scope though , also the front corner of the rail should be removed or shaved back so scopes can be brought back more for less eye relief , mine is just ok. could not put a recol pad on though .. Also a peep sight drilled in it like the M14.ca mount would be cool , looks like it would be possible.
Last edited by boss351cleveland; 01-09-2016 at 05:39 AM.
are they thinking about a second generation of these with the fixes being brought forward here?
I am up for one, but I don't like it in its current state.
the CGN formerly know as John_in_BC
I think I will stick with the side mount, it's cheaper, lower, and works perfectly.
Last edited by plonker; 02-26-2016 at 02:50 PM.
Plonker, which one is that?
the CGN formerly know as John_in_BC