 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Instead of petitioning for De-Restricting the AR, how about going for something easier for the crown to swallow , ie - if you have access to private land out side of a major city then you should be able to "Target shoot ONLY " with a restricted firearm. Not on crown land and no hunting but safe , responsible plinking out at the farm.
How is this a newbie FAQ?
Anyway, it would be easier to de-restrict it.
Instead of being troubled by what is really evil, people make a big fuss over what is merely conventionally evil. -Diogenes
What are you referring to when you say de-restrict the 'AR'?
Make it non-restricted, I imagine.Originally Posted by JohnDo
When he says AR, does he mean assault rifle?
lol, oh boy
Indeed a newbie question. I would say in that case, 911 will be ringing off the hook.
CSSA Life Member
Restricted means only at the range. Making up a law, specifically for the AR to say that you can shoot it in special additional places doesn't make sense.
With the current glacial movement of pro-gun legislation, nothing significant will happen until the Lib/NDP alliance prohibit them.
Instead of being troubled by what is really evil, people make a big fuss over what is merely conventionally evil. -Diogenes
interesting first post and thread.
the whole classification of firearms needs to be changed full stop.
simplification of the laws please,no more complicated paragraphs of nonsense and restrictions............please
i do hope you aint no troll inciting trouble on here as we havent had a 20 page
flame session for a while.
typical British wankers
I had a Colt Sporter Match H-Bar that I bought in '91and had a couple of years of fun with it before going restricted.
Just figured I'd throw that in there to make the younger guys jealous...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote