lolOriginally Posted by nzclaybuster
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
lol
Hopefully that's the only restriction your wife places on you.
Brno Arms had and still has reputation for extremely talented designers, engineers, their DESIGN - WAY AHEAD OF OTHERS, WAY AHEAD OF TIME, UNCOMPROMIZING QUALITY, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OLD WORLD CRAFTSMANSHIP and long LASTING BEAUTY ~Brnomann
Lots of wrong answers in this thread....
IF she has an RPAL and IF she is a member of the range and IF she has at least one restricted registered to her for "target shooting" so she has the ATT condition thingy on her RPAL
THEN
YES you can lend her one of your restricteds to take to the range and shoot. You do NOT have to live together, but, in theory, you would have to lend it to her somewhere that you both can transport to/from, like the range for example.
IF you lend it to her, you MUST also give her a copy of the reg certificate
that is the current way it works, I"m not a lawyer but anyone can go look it up for themselves
pics of gf aren't loading...
oh... shoot... 'This isn't ARFCOM... 'Sorry.
Bernie Rhodes knows. Don't Argue
Sorry that is not how it works now. Talked to the CFO about this when I got my renewal. New licence had the ATT conditions to a range as firearms registered to me. STATT for me to borrow my wife's or for her to borrow mine. Even the gal at the CFO thought it was stupid to require spouses to have to get a STATT. My wife keeps her pistols in the same safe as I do, so you think she doesn't have access?
This ain't Dodge City,And you ain't Bill Hickok. Quigley down under.
The CFO in your province is breaking C42. The law is very clear that the CFO MUST attach a condition to the RPAL that allows transport of restricteds "in your POSSESSION" to the range for target shooting, it also specifies the rules for "lending" a restricted gun to someone and thereby putting it into their possession.
The law does NOT say "registered to you" it says "in your possession" and it also does not give the CFO any choice in the matter.
The Alberta CFO has been sued many times for different things and lost, this will eventually just be another case where the CFO loses in court.
GOD bless you in Canada, Australia, and the UK (probably other nations as well) for being willing to go through what you do just to enjoy a little trigger time or hunting. It is quite evident your Government sure isn't.
It's the same in ontario. My attachments page says restricted firearms registered to me
"Take a deep breath, and find your balls..."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote