By all means, feel free to do all you can.Originally Posted by WhOiS
My post does not suggest otherwise.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By all means, feel free to do all you can.
My post does not suggest otherwise.
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest." - Mohandas Gandhi
Voting lieberal is what brought this on! This is probably only the "tip of the iceberg." I would be happy to donate $$$ towards a legal challenge to this and "other" useless, oppressive interpretation of Canadian law!
Voting Liberal is NOT what brought this on. Voting for one party over another should not remove your rights as a Canadian citizen. Never blindly follow one party, or blindly hate on another due to its name.
I am going to be writing my MP in regards to this, and donating some money to the cause to fight this. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
So I was thinking...
"paragraph 3 (1)(b) of the Regulations prohibit a cartridge magazine that is capable of containing more than 10 cartridges of the type for which the magazine was originally designed and that is designed or manufactured for use in a semi-automatic handgun that is commonly available in Canada."
I believe the 10/22 Charger handgun was not introduced or available until ~2007. A 10/22 magazine over 10 rounds manufactured between 1964 and 2006, would by definition "NOT be originally designed for a handgun" because the 10/22 Charger handgun simply did not exist unless you could time travel.
Would this mean that there exists a class of pre-2007 magazines that might still be legal based on the RCMP's own semantics? Or are they saying that formerly law abiding people become criminals instantly with the addition of a pistol variant to the FRT? This is so ripe to get tested in court!
It would still be a pistol that accepts a detachable magazine, Just prohibited... Nothing would change for rifle magazines.
Liberals said they would give decision making ability to the RCMP "professionals" regarding firearms even before the were elected... Therefore voting liberal IS what caused this garbage.
Triple bread rounds for the win
if the RCMP would spend as much time as they are persecuting legal gun owners to get illegal guns off the streets, the world would be safer.. and alot of legal gun owners happier.
But no they dont.. instead of doing their job, they are treating us like criminals And the bad guys runaway with illegal guns that wont be used to shoot paper.
gunpowder for breakfast and Trudeau for the circus
Agreed. Key Performance Indicator (KPI) needs to be realigned. Let alone wasted tax dollars that we all citizens pay for.
Surely you jest... and they will be taking a lot more than a mile.
CSSA CCFR CPC
Leaving the mechanism for harassment intact (C-68) is tge biggest factor. It's like Socialists. They're okay in theory until they build gulags and their true nature comes out. Our long, long, long anticipated replacement Firearms Act will be a vote magnet.
Listen, and understand. That Liberal is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse- only fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your guns are gone.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote