Yeah, I'm not sure how to make good on these deals. Any links? I'm actually looking for one now.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Yeah, I'm not sure how to make good on these deals. Any links? I'm actually looking for one now.
But dont bullet have a different ballistic anyways depending on temperature? Hot air is less dense so traveling easier?
I have used EOTech's my entire career without any issues at all including in extreme temperature. Unless you're going to the North Pole, you have nothing to worry about.
you need to do a little more researchOriginally Posted by Lurcher6
Why does he need to do any more research than his first hand experiences his "entire career"???
I've been using EOTechs for over a decade and, like many, have NEVER had an issue whatsoever. Have there been issues, yes. But really, how many of us are using these things in an LEO or military capacity?
"Let the shoosting begin!!!" - Goldmember - Circa 2002
Anecdotal evidence doesn't matter. $23.6 million settlement states otherwise
The $23.6m in damages. I wonder if that was based on product sales or some other damages. That would be the equivalent of ~47,000 units.
I have one of the supposedly affected Eotechs (ie. all of them sold before the recall) and I've thought about sending it in for a refund cheque and getting an Aimpoint instead. Aimpoints have that bulletproof reliability and ridiculous battery life going for them.
In the end though, I just love that giant window with the 65 MOA ring and 1 MOA dot too much. Having to adjust to looking through a black tube at a 2 MOA dot (all Aimpoints) would probably be more detrimental to my accuracy than a "defective" Eotech.
For the record I looked into this to
I did not return my eotech.
I found independent heat and cold test on eotech, aimpoint, and ?
They all lost zero to some degree and eotech was not the worst.
Posting Permissions
