Thank you all for reaffirming and providing advice.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Thank you all for reaffirming and providing advice.
I believe this is the case you were looking for.
http://firearmslaw.ca/2011/08/30/har...ourt-decision/
I think he was referring to this case, but yous is applicable too: http://cssa-cila.org/garryb/publications/2006/716.htmOriginally Posted by ProX2
Thanks ProX2, for that judicial decision ^^ it makes clear alot of things that I had been wondering about.
The fellow in question had his guns in steel CABINETS not what we all would call SAFES, but even so, the judge did accept them as SAFES.
There was no VAULT room, just a locked bedroom door.
The main guns in question were prohibited full autos that were being stored together with their bolts and thus the police wanted a decision.
So then, use those light metal cabinets with confidence.
Some guy broke into a real bank vault in 5 minutes. LolI remember this story too. Unfortunately, given enough time, tools, and determination anything can be broken into, even bank vaults. Hopefully RangeBob in 3...2...1...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qw_4HQMS-pk
If you anticipate proactive anti gun persecution and prosecution actions against gun owners on the part of the anti gun Canadian legal system you can save yourselves heartache, stress and thousands of dollars in legal bills.
We bought a half dozen trigger locks (and cables for the lever actions) at Ellwood Epps store this summer and put them on the 5 non restricted guns we have stored in that flimsy crappy tire gun cabinet a muscular kid could open in 5 minutes with a claw hammer.
Cheaper than paying burlew or friedman 2 years of our cpp.
Lol
Maybe you should google Mike Hargreaves and read up before you dismiss it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote