This ruling is complete BS, how could they be satisfied with the receiver but not happy with the parts on the rifle? It's contrary to established precedence.
Anyways keep up the good fight Marstar.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
This ruling is complete BS, how could they be satisfied with the receiver but not happy with the parts on the rifle? It's contrary to established precedence.
Anyways keep up the good fight Marstar.
"Loyalty Above All Else Except Honour"
THis is BS. It is the receiver that determines the firearms, not the part.
Pfff, so if I put the flashsuppressor of an AK on a Rem 700, the Rem 700 is a prohib. That is just retarded.
Please send all private messages on CGN admin issues to "CGN Admin" account
Yup - I'm confused. I guess there would be no way to fight this in court? Or costs would be prohibitively expensive given the value of the rifles?Originally Posted by johnone
I'd donate cash to help fund the legal proceedings - I'm serious.
Last edited by Clobbersauras; 03-26-2009 at 09:21 PM.
------------------------------
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk. - Tuco
this is complete bull####. I mean ####, I can make my marlin model 60 .22LR FA in about 15 minutes, better ban all those too then.
WHAT in gods name is the RCMP thinking.
Never give up ... fight even after it's over.
--------------------------------------------------------
Great hunter. Yes? Fine figure of a man. Yes?
Good. That is all you need to know. For now.
Walther G22.
Firearm is non-resricted as long as it has no stock, since the stock is prohibited. Makes tons of sense..... To someone... Somewhere...
"Every loss of a soldier is a significant one. These great Canadians, died serving Canada and the people of Afghanistan."
Modified statement of Col. Mike Cessford, deputy commander of Canadian Forces in Afghanistan.
Vice President for the Canadian Shooting Sports Association www.cssa-cila.org
Active participant of the ODPL www.odplonline.org
That does make sesne - because the OIC does specify "bullpup stock".
Please send all private messages on CGN admin issues to "CGN Admin" account
can we sue the RCMP?
CSSA Member
OSGC Member
Thanks Marstar.
I could not begin to imagine how much work is involved in an undertaking like this.
From travel to European nations, meetings in factories, long hours on the phone and dealing with the Canadian Bureaucracy....just to name a few things.
I hope you work out a favorable resolution. It would be a shame that your company has take a large hit like this providing us with products we love.
Now.. So can you just sell the receivers? Strip the so called 'FA' parts out and replace them??
This is absolute BS.
Guess its off to the courts soon.
CPC, CSSA
The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. — John Stuart Mill
I understand that a lot of capital is tied up because of this but I do not understand how the following three points amount to any type of success against the RCMP's unprofessional behaviour:
1. The meeting was productive
2. You are Seeking Resolution
3. The rifles will remain prohibited
I'm glad it was productive. You deserve compensation, but not at the expense of allowing the RCMP to act in this manner. No firearm is safe, if they are allowed to arbitrarily re-classify rifles at will. Please explain points 1 and 2. It would clear up a lot.
Posting Permissions
