Page 26 of 29 FirstFirst ... 616181920212223242526272829 LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 289

Thread: Reclassification Status on the BD38 and BD3008?

  1. #251
    GunNutz stencollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
    Posts
    4,389
    Quote Originally Posted by CanAm View Post
    Some more ugly stuff coming this spring/summer. The reclassification wheels are turning.
    Heard some hints of this. One of them may be a bigger one....not so much in size but in numbers.

    Only slightly substantiated rumours, so I'll keep them to myself.
    Last edited by stencollector; 04-15-2013 at 09:18 PM.

  2. #252
    CGN Regular BlkMamba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    231
    Quote Originally Posted by stencollector View Post
    Heard some hints of this. One of them may be a bigger one....not so much in size but in numbers.
    Really? What hints have you heard?

  3. #253
    CGN frequent flyer skip1600's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,396
    I'm interested too. Reclassified based on what? .. Another loud mouth trying to save his own rear by dragging others down?

  4. #254
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer MegaMonkeyChunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Montréal, Québec
    Posts
    2,640
    Quote Originally Posted by CanAm View Post
    Some more ugly stuff coming this spring/summer. The reclassification wheels are turning.
    Ugly as in they'll finally make some "ugly" bullpups NR again or ugly as in let's prohibit more bullpups because they're ugly.

  5. #255
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    88
    delete delete delete
    Last edited by dalebrown5546; 03-06-2014 at 06:13 PM.

  6. #256
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    36,495
    Keep in mind that there has to be a legal justification for the classification. The Walther .22 bullpup was singled out because its barrelled action was fitted into a stock which was deemed prohibited.
    If a bullpup is not a barrelled action/stock design, there is no legal basis for prohibition.
    Auto converson is something else. The T97s failed on that basis. As much as it is popular to claim that the RCMP has unlimited power, their rulings have to meet the letter of the law, and legal precedents. The use of 10 round pistol magazines in semi auto centerfire rifles was approved because of the letter of the law.

  7. #257
    Canada Ammo - CGN Sponsor CanAm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    19,826
    yes, many of you can do the math. The have a list and are checking in twice, thrice...

  8. #258
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Onterrible
    Posts
    18,072
    I'm guessing some of the vz58's are high on the RCMP wish list.
    Keeping it real on the range since before there was a CGN.

  9. #259
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    88
    delete delete delete
    Last edited by dalebrown5546; 03-06-2014 at 06:12 PM.

  10. #260
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Claven2 View Post
    I'm guessing some of the vz58's are high on the RCMP wish list.
    It could be argued that they look just like an AK variant, and they fire the same cartridge.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •