Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: SAN 511 .50cal

  1. #31
    Offical The Shooting Edge Rep.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    151
    I would imagine economies of scale play a part.

    That said, I wouldn't mind $1000 .50BMG rifles.

  2. #32
    Member lacloche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    québec
    Posts
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by TSE_Justin View Post
    Swiss Arms bought design and tooling from AMSD (another Swiss company), made some changes (like the barrrel).

    The AI AW50 + kit we had for sale was a consignment piece... price was $17,000. Different type of gun.
    ok i see 10000$ for ax50 at wolverine its just for the gun or with kit

  3. #33
    Newbie jules203's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    27
    Wow, very impressive rifle.

  4. #34
    CGN Regular Matt_mg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MTL, Canada
    Posts
    579
    That's what's sad with CGN you can't bring in something new and upscale without having a bunch of whiners.

    If you think this rifle is not worth it go buy a Hagelberg or a Canstar, those sell for $3000!
    Or better yet go buy a .50 bmg barrel and dremel yourself a custom .50 ...

  5. #35
    Northern Mod Boomer686's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Big Land
    Posts
    7,214
    Wow..... just wow!
    Enjoying your freedom? Thank A Soldier !!!

    You say nobody needs an AR15? Well nobody needs a whiny little b*tch either yet here you are!

  6. #36
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    809
    Quote Originally Posted by lacloche View Post
    the accurancy international its 10 500$ but the swiss arm its the cadillac
    I would say the AI is a Rolls, but I'm not sure where I'd place Swiss from a brand perspective. Not a Cadillac though.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat
    or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy.
    It is our job to see that it stays there." George Orwell.

  7. #37
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer dizzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,964
    Quote Originally Posted by TSE_Justin View Post
    I would imagine economies of scale play a part.

    That said, I wouldn't mind $1000 .50BMG rifles.
    I'd be scared to shoot that thing, any 50 bmg better be made from the best material or I am not getting behind it. Thanks for bringing this one. I will be by.

  8. #38
    Offical The Shooting Edge Rep.
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by dizzy View Post
    I'd be scared to shoot that thing, any 50 bmg better be made from the best material or I am not getting behind it. Thanks for bringing this one. I will be by.
    I meant a '$15,000 rifle for $1500'

  9. #39
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer redshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Posts
    2,780
    It's worth what people will pay for it.

    If I could come up with that kind of cash to toss down on a toy I'd buy a good used lathe and a smallish mill and try my hand at making one. Then when I perfect it I'll sell them at Norinco prices. I'd be the man... I know what your thinking...

    Looks nice, it is too bad though that the production is so limited on the big fellas. Just an excuse to jack price unless all the stuff they produce has low production numbers.

  10. #40
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Canuck223's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    7,686
    Quote Originally Posted by zZ_denis View Post
    Although this could've been worded better, i kinda agree with this point.
    There is absolutely no way that production of this rifle costs more than a SAN classic green, for example. Yet it costs 5x more.
    There are two factors involved. You've touched on one, cost of production.
    The second is cost of production facilities.

    If you have a factory running at 100% capacity, retasking it to make a second product begins with the expectation that at minimum, the second product will result in a profit at least as great as the primary product.

    When you have idle capacity, filling it with anything that brings a profit and amortizes the cost of tooling makes sense. When you don't, you don't cut your bottom line.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •