anyone know if battledyne has updated their design .. sounds like they only need to include 1/8" more material or is there more to it in the last 21 pages?
anyone know if battledyne has updated their design .. sounds like they only need to include 1/8" more material or is there more to it in the last 21 pages?
^ no. They are loose fit. Both in the mag well and to the bottom of the mag well/lower end of the receiver(SR-22). I use my two I've acquired for display only, after they performed miserably during a day of shooting. I was using M-22 which worked flawlessly in my factory 10rd mags in tri-mag configuration.
Took 3 of these out recently and all 3 suffered ongoing malfunctions. One of them causes a FTF/FTE every round. or at least 8/10. It's brutal. Using the ruger 10 round magazine that came with the gun I didn't have a single failure. Anything that can be done about this?
I guess I'm lucky, these are still my most reliable 25rnd mags, even more so than the butler creeks. Less wobble than the butler creeks also.
Jeez read first post and didn't realize how old it was then saw what a disaster these turned out to be
Still have a bunch of these junk. What a waste of money. Any updates
The BX works really well. Just saying
MEH, I like the banana clip look for my 22 SR.