i guess but then what is the point of paying $15,000 for that when you get an SKS for $200? shoots same amount of rounds per mag
i guess but then what is the point of paying $15,000 for that when you get an SKS for $200? shoots same amount of rounds per mag
I'd rather be a peace maker than a peace keeper
Danmit Jim... Someone needs to come up with a 10 RD pistol belt for that thing. :D Lol
Unfortunately you have to think like the RCMP here.
They will take the right side plate off and swap out the semi parts with full-auto ones. If it goes all happy-trigger it's a no-go, goes click or semi only, good-to-go. This is pretty much what they do now to all ex-military arm submissions.
If the whole receiver is newly made from scratch and full auto parts won't fit there is no reason it shouldn't be approved.
R.I.P.
Long Gun Registry
December 1st, 1998 - April 5, 2012
Never Again
No, a remanufacture to this degree would not be the case.
Do you have any example of this being the procedure now being applied to all ex-military arms submissions?
This was certainly not the case with the T97, BD38/BD3008.
If you look at the firearms which have been rejected on the basis of convertibility, the conversion procedure is uniformly superficial, requiring minor changes.
So, North Sylva would it be possible to import the Ohio Ordnance Works M240-SLR ?
so 5 rd belts, but it uses disintegrating link? that's more ridiculous than the aluminum rivet in a mag! How could anyone ever enforce such a thing?
OP'd by jbrow397:
We held court on the Internet and as usual, all parties are held in contempt.