Restricted Kriss vector lower

[tacticalII]

I would take a restricted lower for sure.

[frenchyguy]

I dont not understand the benefit of a non restricted upper on a restricted lower. where, 90% of the money parts are in the lower, it would be too close to complete cost to just purchase a lower for any reason/ benefit I can think of. what am I missing? Not being a smart a$$, intrigued rather.

[redddogg69]

I dont not understand the benefit of a non restricted upper on a restricted lower. where, 90% of the money parts are in the lower, it would be too close to complete cost to just purchase a lower for any reason/ benefit I can think of. what am I missing? Not being a smart a$$, intrigued rather.

Without the price from either NS or a retailer, your post is speculation. If the rest lower comes in at even $1000-1200 its worth it. Why spend another $800 on parts I already have. Why do we buy AR15 uppers then, they cost 3/4 the price of a whole rifle.

[redddogg69]

Also remember you could get away with the lower as just the barrel and action as the bolt is interchangeable and easily removed.

[iamzill]

I dont not understand the benefit of a non restricted upper on a restricted lower. where, 90% of the money parts are in the lower, it would be too close to complete cost to just purchase a lower for any reason/ benefit I can think of. what am I missing? Not being a smart a$$, intrigued rather.

The entire trigger assembly is in the upper so it'll be worth way more than just 10%.

Also you can leave the optics on the upper to share it between two lowers, so you save the money on a set of optics.

[frenchyguy]

I see where you are coming from. I have the restricted version, and happy with it. Wish that it was not so picky with ammo.