I am curious if you guys got a chance to test the accuracy of this rifle, and if so how did it do? Comparing it to lets say a Norinco AR-15? As much as I like the cool factor of the bullpup design it still has to be able to hold its own at the range...
Type 97NSR test fire question....
- Thread starter elicitone
- Start date
I'm actually very impressed with the accuracy of the T97NSR.
Here are 3 random images of the accuracy results of the T97NSR off the assembly line.
Thanks,
Jon
- Location
- Winnipeg, now
I would say it is measured in centimeters. The target does not look to be 60 inches high.
The unit should be centi meter .
Two reason:
1. China do not use inch.
2. Have you seen a target paper over 60 inches tall, over 40 inches wide?
I translated the picture, but don't know how to post it.
I posted it in my facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153107048480643&set=gm.489419097810703&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf
Two reason:
1. China do not use inch.
2. Have you seen a target paper over 60 inches tall, over 40 inches wide?
I translated the picture, but don't know how to post it.
I posted it in my facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153107048480643&set=gm.489419097810703&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf
bcbravo2zero
CGN Regular
Calibre magazine has a review in their July/August edition.
They said that they had no failures with a variety of ammo, 1.5 inch groups at 100 yds, "butter-smooth" charging, that it has a "well made and efficient gas system with an astoundingly slick action" and that the trigger is actually "excellent" for a bullpup.
They said that they had no failures with a variety of ammo, 1.5 inch groups at 100 yds, "butter-smooth" charging, that it has a "well made and efficient gas system with an astoundingly slick action" and that the trigger is actually "excellent" for a bullpup.
Beretta-Skeet
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Eastern ONT
Tony does it say at what range this group was fired at.
2.2cm at 100m would work out to be 3/4 moa, which I kinda doubt
So it must be either 50 or 25m ( 1 1/2 or 3 moa ).
Oh yes, now we're talking, can we have this.
Do I really need to post those 100m groups AGAIN!?
Edited as requested.
I had a Tavor and more than one 97 but I did not shoot them side by side.
But in my opinion they shoot different tho.
This was shot this with my Type 97 in a friendly competition a month ago.
My rifle: Benchrested, Zeiss scope.
Distance: 109 meters.
Each group is 10-shot. The squares in the grid of the paper are 1" x 1".
Shooter: Lector He used his own ammo.
Between group 6 and 7 he took a break.
Edited as requested.
Last edited:
They were previously brought into the country (4 years ago?), but were deemed prohibited by the RCMP due to them being easily convertible to full auto. From what I gather they had a design that they hired the chinese to do, but they simply converted some fully auto type 97 rifles to semi auto and sent them here. The police did an inspection on arrival to Canada and discovered this. Not all were converted autos but many were apparently.
This new design has a receiver that does not accept any parts from the original T97 from what I understand and hence it is non-restricted.
I hope that helps.
It has been for sale before. The RCMP classified it as a non-restricted, but then looked at it from an unknown angle and went "That is so prohibited."
