wow. chinese CQ at it's worst.
Wonder what the story is with the confusion on being required to return the SKS as well.
wow. chinese CQ at it's worst.
Wonder what the story is with the confusion on being required to return the SKS as well.
Jesus. Wanted a 305 but damn if the finish is that bad forget it please tell me others with that gun are much different
CSSA - NFA - NRA Member
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS
Hard to believe a rifle like that could be sent to a customer... JP.
They sold the cream first and kept the garbage for the last few buyers. Smart, in a diabolical kind of way.
I believe this is an unfair statement. Marstar doesn't need to play these games.
Marstar will find a way to make the OP happy. a free SKS or a discount on the new batch or something from inventory. The customer must be satisfied. Let us give John a chance.
They have always done right by me even when I was a little unreasonable
مسلم مؤمن
worst part would be you can't even get a replacement, and when the new ones come in they will be priced higher...
Member of CSSA
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. - George Santayana
TAP, RACK, BANG
I would appreciate it if you could look into it for me.
As it stands I was advised I have pay for extra shipping one way (the initial return), and the replacement M305 is still going to have the same hand/drill sanded finish on the receiver.
I was told it should be shipping back to me maybe tomorrow or probably this Friday. If the finish is not CNC I will be probably be returning the rifle a second time. To be honest, I would have not have purchased this rifle had I seen it in a store.
If you are out of M305's can you give me a rain cheque on the next batch that comes in? Not sure how this is going to get resolved at this point.
-------
edit: Also can you clear up whether or not I should be charged for shipping both rifles back?
I did as I was told to do on the phone at the time, but the story changed after it was sent back, and I'm being charged for it anyways. Confused.
Thanks.
Last edited by cgnnut; 10-22-2013 at 08:46 PM.