$vboptions[bbtitle]


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: selling restricted - meet at shooting range

  1. #11
    CGN Regular sallen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    642
    Quote Originally Posted by luke s View Post
    im not so sure; either way, it is unenforceable
    It seems clear to me. For the seller to move it to the range, it needs to be registered to his address. For the buyer to take it home, it needs to be registered to their address. Unless the registration change takes place while the firearm is at the range (which would be next to impossible to setup) one or the other is braking the law. You may call it unenforceable, but if the firearm shows up in another place, without a valid way to get it there, you could be charged.

    My point is that the only real way to do this (in Ontario) is to get a STATT. I know some of the ATTs out West do allow you to move a restricted owned by someone else. In this case it would be possible to meet at a range.
    “Gun control is the only kind of policy that we have where the proponents of it will point to it's utter failure as evidence that we need even more of it!" - JNG

  2. #12
    HELP! I sold my soul to the internet luke s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    3,995
    that is fine, call and get a STATT when meeting at the range

  3. #13
    HELP! I sold my soul to the internet Colin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    11,183
    the problem is that once the transfer is complete, the gun is not yours and not covered by your LATT. It's dumb but it does sort of make sense in a perverted way. I just asked to have my local post office placed my LATT for firearms packaged for mail. No such luck.
    People should not have to fear both the government and the criminal. It should be that the criminal fears both the people and the government.

    Visit my Blog http://denofzeus.blogspot.com/[/
    Please contribute your stories about Gun Registry failureshttp://epicfailuresgunregistry.blogspot.com/

  4. #14
    I have no life Tuco Pike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,909
    And yet another reason for ATT's to be a condition on your license. Just simply worded "for all legal transportation purposes of restricted firearms."

  5. #15
    CGN Regular Noltz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    628
    I would call directly and ask but they're closed in my time zone. Can you not call ahead and say "Hi, I'm headed to buy a Glock from a member at my club. I'll need an ATT to bring it home. How long do you need to fax one up to the Club office? I'll pick it up from there."

    I'm sure I'm missing something. I have an RPAL but no restricted firearms yet, but when I called and asked about "reasonably direct route" I got a favorable answer and the ladies were very polite... just seems odd that we're jumping through hoops to avoid a STATT. Now, picking it up from the post office is a different story.

  6. #16
    CGN Regular clhdluke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    151
    I bought a restricted through a range where I am a member and I still required a STATT to take it from the range to home despite having a LTATT. Seems strange, but these are the rules we must follow.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
collapse blockhead options_correctBookmarks