I'm not saying completely redesign simple for looks. I'm saying there's no excuse for some of their current features other than simple laziness or lack of skill.
That's a bit of a given, who is jard? What's their history? From what I understand it's a group of newbies. Top tier firearms are beautiful in their simplicity, but they are not simple to engineer. I very much doubt a nobody company like JARD has the engineering know how to put together a top shelf firearm. I'm not trying to be rude and disrespectful to the company, but it's like me starting a new firearms company. I am sympathetic to their ambition, but I'm not particularly hopeful for their future.
1) This looks like a civilian only company. They don't have the massive backings of the old giants ala colt fn hk etc. They don't have gov contracts bringing in money for them, or massive civvy sales, ala ruger, smith & wesson etc.
2) Not having a ton of money to start with means they can't really afford the cream of the crop of the firearm engineers
3) They can't afford extensive R&D, so even if they are to manage to put it all together they have one shot to get this right. Meaning it won't be tested extensively
4) Even if it manages to get through all of that, it won't be price competitive, because they don't have the scale of production.
I could be wrong and they just might beat all the odds, but realistically, this is some persons ambition(and I feel for them. I really do, I have many doodles of random semi auto firearms that I secretly hoped would see the light of day someday) and that person needs a good bit of luck in order for this to succeed. Especially in such a saturated market.
Tavors seem to be selling quite well, they aren't the cheapest firearms you know...
With the swiss and cz858 knocked out it is the only battle ready non res firearm, it's a bit of a given.