13 round Ruger SR9 magazines

cr5 said:
Lol, no. That's totally legal.
Your post wasn't very clear and sounded like you were being a bad boy.
Keep up the good work :)
Click to expand...

You got me worry for a sec... I am never a bad boy, to many grandkids could replicate a bad behavior from grampa... JP.
 
sailor723 said:
Besides Beretta (and apparently Glock?) are there any other manufacturers whose .40 mags that will reliably hold and feed 9mm? I know my .40 cal Browning Hi Power mags won't (feed lips too wide)
Click to expand...

I tried with Glock with my 17 and 22 and the 22 mag in the 17 would double feed, not very good, maybe you need to have the same Gen for it to work... JP.
 
I have trouble wrapping my head around the reason the Liberals felt that eleven rounds out of a pistol, then dropping the mag, slamming in a fresh one, racking the slide, and being able to fire another ten rounds is so much less lethal than having 18 rounds available with no mag change? It only takes a couple of seconds to load a fresh mag and rack the slide...is that going to save more lives when a nut job strikes again? Can the Liberals explain why ten rounds in a magazine is the magic number in pistols, but in semi auto centrefire rifles we're restricted to five? I was hoping the Conservatives would address some of this stupidity with some common sense new legislation by now...
 
caramel said:
I tried with Glock with my 17 and 22 and the 22 mag in the 17 would double feed, not very good, maybe you need to have the same Gen for it to work... JP.
Click to expand...

I had read that it wouldn't work with Glock mags but then I'v seen some posts on here claiming it does. Maybe it's one of those "sorta, sometimes works kinda"

things?;)

The reason I ask is that I just bought a 9mm Kel Tec Sub 2000 that takes Glock mags and I was wondering if it made sense to buy extra mags for a Glock 22 rather than a 17
 
pisces-guy said:
I have trouble wrapping my head around the reason the Liberals felt that eleven rounds out of a pistol, then dropping the mag, slamming in a fresh one, racking the slide, and being able to fire another ten rounds is so much less lethal than having 18 rounds available with no mag change? It only takes a couple of seconds to load a fresh mag and rack the slide...is that going to save more lives when a nut job strikes again? Can the Liberals explain why ten rounds in a magazine is the magic number in pistols, but in semi auto centrefire rifles we're restricted to five? I was hoping the Conservatives would address some of this stupidity with some common sense new legislation by now...
Click to expand...

Because stopping to reload takes a long time and is all the time needed to take down a bad guy.


Now don't you feel safer?
 
sailor723 said:
I had read that it wouldn't work with Glock mags but then I'v seen some posts on here claiming it does. Maybe it's one of those "sorta, sometimes works kinda"

things?;)

The reason I ask is that I just bought a 9mm Kel Tec Sub 2000 that takes Glock mags and I was wondering if it made sense to buy extra mags for a Glock 22 rather than a 17
Click to expand...
I have tried G22 (.40) mags loaded with 9mm in a G19. It loads 13 rds in mine and cycles fine. BUT you need the G22 15 pinned to 10 mags for this to work.
I bought some G22 Gen 3 built to 10 only mags and they don't hold the 9mm rds as the mag gets full, the bullets sorta squirt out. My experience anyways.
 
pisces-guy said:
I have trouble wrapping my head around the reason the Liberals felt that eleven rounds out of a pistol, then dropping the mag, slamming in a fresh one, racking the slide, and being able to fire another ten rounds is so much less lethal than having 18 rounds available with no mag change? It only takes a couple of seconds to load a fresh mag and rack the slide...is that going to save more lives when a nut job strikes again? Can the Liberals explain why ten rounds in a magazine is the magic number in pistols, but in semi auto centrefire rifles we're restricted to five? I was hoping the Conservatives would address some of this stupidity with some common sense new legislation by now...
Click to expand...

Remember first that magazine restrictions are a Conservative thing, thanks Kim....
Then remember that the gun laws are there to piss you off enough to quit the sport/hobby and they make perfect sense....public safety has never been part of the equation, Allan Rock and other architects of C-68 came right out and admitted it, the public has just been spoon fed the 'public safety' line for so long they actually believe it....
 
I will be able to try if it work proprely with the Steyr pistol, i have a L9 A1 and just bought from SFRC yesterday a M40 A1, i will try a 40 in the 9... JP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom