wow ....
born on another continent and a little later than most of you guys lol i didnt follow the Elmer Jack fights but if i remember Jack has got similar caliber guns than Elmer especially for the rifles ... what were really the differences betwen them?
In the Elmer/Jack fight, I sided with Jack.
Jack O'Connor was the most common sense gun writer I have ever read.
Outdoor Life magazine was struggling to keep a few hundred thousand readers when Jack took over as shooting editor. Virtually because of him, Outdoor Life grew to a monthly circulation of over three million!
Jack just made common sense out of situations. For example he once wrote that you could have a lifetime of experience with a 270 and with a 30-06, but in the field you could not tell the difference between them.
He also once told of how many hundreds of big game animals he had either shot, or seen shot, with the 7x57 and how many hundred animals he had either shot, or seen shot, with the 7mm Remington magnum and he could really not distinguish any difference between the two, in actual killing power. Good hit, dead animal, poor hit, wounded animal.
Elmer Keith on the other hand, was very biased and opinionated. In his big game hunting book he remarks that people often ask him why he runs down the 30-06 calibre so. He states it is because he has seen more game wounded with a 30-06 than with any other calibre!
Anyway, it always seemed to me that Jack had the best, most practical and above all, a common sense solution to hunters and shooters problems. I guess it didn't hurt that in expressing himself, he had the background of being a university language professor, before going full time into the shooting world.
Sorry Johnn!