LaRue, PWS, KAC etc, What Are We Really Paying For?

Testing and performance.

Colts are fine but these guns were developed to take that Colt to a higher level, just like how CC makes a better gun than Colt USA. But I would have no problem using any of them and I do.

i have both, an m4 an a c8

the barrel on the c8 absolutely
the finish on the c8 absolutely
the rest, still have to check
 
By the time that wear shows it has killed 3 Colt Canada rifles.

52078527.jpg
 
Jason Falla was the lead instructor on my HK course, maybe sometimes it good to hear from a "real end user" if you don't recognize the name, well GIYF;

First off, you have to be aware that military units don't just look up the H&K website and select a rifle for service and put in a purchase order. Military units consult with H&K in order to build a weapon specifically for the user requirements of the said unit.

The HK416 was designed to provide a very specialized unit with an enhanced capability that incorporates the familiar control features of the Direct Gas Impingement 'legacy system'. This wasn't something that HK just dreamed up and decided to build.

The engineering that HK Germany have put into the 416 is quite amazing. That engineering doesn't come cheap either. HK have been building piston guns for a long time and is part of the reason why they have been able to produce such a good product with the 416. This wasn't their go on the merry-go-round!

The SCAR program had nothing to do with the development of the HK416 as far as I am aware. The SCAR was developed around the concept of a multi-caliber/ multi barrel length carbine. One gun that could provide Special Operations with the flexibility to change weapons configurations per mission requirements. The goal posts for the SCAR development was moved a number of times before 'they' wanted two weapons, a SCAR Light and a SCAR Heavy.

FN clearly have the machine gun market cornered but the FN SCAR leaves a lot to be desired for me. Some recent changes to the SCAR reflect some of its deficiencies for a weapon that is suitable for Special Operations.

I have shot the SCAR and think that it does not handle as well as weapons built using the AR15/ M16 platform. The SCAR is overly large, particularly the forward hand guards, preventing the use of modern shooting techniques. I personally don't see a bright future for the SCAR. Especially when the HK 416/417 have been able to successfully fill that void.

The HK 416 is in service and fielded by the Norwegian Army. HK made some very specialized modifications for that project and some that have flow on to the U.S market with the release of the 416A5.

The 416C (PDW) is an interesting version. The stock for me does not lend itself for good check weld but for HK I guess it was their way of saying that they can build just about anything!

As for foreign militaries and the weapons they have selected, it is very difficult to change something that is already in the system. The 416 was developed for the U.S market and the Germans already had a weapon in their inventory. Trying to change that platform is like changing the M16 to a G36 for the U.S Army!

These are my thoughts only.

The HK416 is the best short stroke carbine on the market today and just like any weapon, if you treat it right it will treat you right.

I am yet to replace any parts on my HK416's due to usage. I have replaced a 'C-Clip' on the rod that retains the ejection ports cover. This has been fixed with the A5 model 416's as HK have changed the design.

I have replaced a firing pin spring after one of our students who was used to a direct gas impingement system inadvertently left it out during the reassemble! The weapon will still function without it but it's better to have all the parts in place.

I would stock up on the few items that you might need over time. The bolt will need to be replaced after about 15k (or shoot it til it breaks) the other common maintenance technique!

I would have an extractor, firing pin spring, some C-clips, a new bolt and thats about it for the upper.

If you are not shooting an HK lower, you may have to replace a fire control group every so often. Due to the higher than normal gas pressures and speed of the BCG during the cocking phase, the bolt hits the hammer very hard, which in tern strikes the disconnector. The disconnector is the part that typically breaks after time. If you buy an HK Two-Stage Trigger, this problem is solved by the bridge plate that sits over the disconnector protecting it from hammer strike.

There are some cool new products for the HK 416 series now from replacement rail assemblies from Remington, Geisselle etc. You will need one of the low-pro HK gas blocks IOT fit a newer type rail on though. The low-pro block does not feature the sling mounts allowing the narrower rails to go right on.


Just so we are clear, this isn't about "waving the HK flag" it's merely an example. I"m sure there are other "testimonials" out there for KAC and Colt.

The OP wanted to know if there is a difference, and there is, I think that to some extend it's articulated here? You be the judge, it's your money.
 
Last edited:

Nope it is true, comes from all the experts I have spoken too, sorry it just is. It's not KOOLAID the gun is made to do things in certain areas that a lot of the competition was not, you can see this by the USMC choosing the 416 for its IAR program.
 
Also years back I had a direct comparisons with a HK416 and heavy barrel C8 10.3 respectably and the weight was very close on that particular C8 to the 416 I had at the time. As I will state firearms can be made by whatever company for that specific contract so it is hard at times to compare which is best and then through in cost for the buyer and that can be a determining factor as well. Although limited in comparing them scientifically at the time in this one instance you could see the HK was far ahead. I still would have no problem using either of them in practically all situation imaginable.
 
I dont buy or own cheap crap, that being said, Ive never shot a 416 so dont know, given my salary and priorities, i will likely never shoot one.

Its great to talk about an ultra expensive unobtainium rifle, but the reality is 99.99% of cgn has never shot one. I handled a used mr223 once at reliable, considered buying it for 4 minutes, then left.

I have probably as much chance of buying one of the unicorn NR AR10 than ever buying a 416.
 
Last edited:
In the case of HK most of the premium you're paying for is the barrel. They have superior barrel materials and manufacturing technology. They also have very strict quality control.

In the case of the HK416 program, HK also made a number of engineering upgrades to the traditional M4 platform. These are little things based on end-user feedback. It is often in the form of small dimensional adjustments and improved tolerances. An example is fixing carrier tilt issues. These are subtle things that most people wouldn't notice without knowledge that it was done.

Despite the lion's share of the premium being barrel, there is also a significant portion that is purely importation fee related and mark-up for Canadian end-users because supply is tightly controlled with very little competition.
 
End-users very often subject candidate systems to very rigorous testing programs. The specs for the firearm and the performance expectations are known to the manufacturers.

When HK is aware of the specs and the testing criteria, and they design the platform to these specs, they almost certainly win. There are cases where they have not had time to design/modify for the specific test, have submitted guns in the applicable category that they had lying around, and still won. That says a lot. An example is the 417. I can't recall who's procurement/order this was for.
 
Also the bcg has a bundle of secrets in the materials and there are special versions of that too along with barrels.
 
IMO there's a lot of times when you quickly stop paying for a products quality and start paying for the name.
HK is huge on charging retarded amounts of money thanks to their name. I can't remember the part it was but basically on any other AR it was a $75-$100 piece and for an HK version it was over $800.

There also seems to be companies that spring up over night and think if they have a cool name and jack their prices up people will pay big. Sadly I think they're often right.
 
IMO there's a lot of times when you quickly stop paying for a products quality and start paying for the name.
HK is huge on charging retarded amounts of money thanks to their name. I can't remember the part it was but basically on any other AR it was a $75-$100 piece and for an HK version it was over $800.

There also seems to be companies that spring up over night and think if they have a cool name and jack their prices up people will pay big. Sadly I think they're often right.

While I understand what you're saying, I'm guessing that manufacturing in Germany is more expensive than say China/US. That's just an example.Given the "proprietary" nature of most of the HK product line, that "builds" in additional costs.
 
The very 1st AR I ever built used 100% Spike's parts. I've used it hard for the past 4 years or so and never once had a bobble. I find it just as accurate as my CC SA20 and my buddy's KAC that I shoot from time to time.

Will it stand up to the same punishment? Probably not. But for the average 3 gun/CQB match it's more than enough. I doubt most of us will ever need the level of reliability the CC and HKs can deliver, and the slight difference in MOA (if there is one) at a set distance probably doesn't amount to much anyways.

Just my nickel.
 
I would not give back my KAC SR15, kind of when you shoot it you know nothing else will do as good, i barely use my DD MK18 no more... JP.
 
While I understand what you're saying, I'm guessing that manufacturing in Germany is more expensive than say China/US. That's just an example.Given the "proprietary" nature of most of the HK product line, that "builds" in additional costs.

You're right, the cost of doing business in Germany is much higher, there are also other challenges as well, especially for firearms manufacturers. For example, over here in NA, when we decide to make a barrel, a bloke with a bit of know-how and the right tools can build one without too much trouble. In Germany you have to have the plans drawn up, examined by an engineer, then they have to supervise the prototype's manufacture, then it's off to a proving house to have it tested to it's limit. Everything is over engineered because of two things, 1). the law 2). it's very Teutonic. ;)

-S.
 
Lack of understanding what quality means comes from the cycle of average Canadian gun ownership. Buy, fire couple of rounds (usually from the bench), take some cool pictures, put some accessories on your firearm. Fire it couple more times, buy more accessories. Sell on EE for as much as possible. That's it. No wonder that Norincos are so popular.
 
Back
Top Bottom