Any of you heard of Dan Theodore?
He's a famous writer and a champion BPCR shooter.
I was going by the Greenhill formula as a lot of others do and this is what he said to me about it and I quote.
"Guys,
The information on the above site concerning caliber, twist and bullet length is less than useless, it if flat-out WRONG. Do not use any estimates based on the Greenhill Formula or its derivatives like the Modified Greenhill published by Charlie Dell.
There are a number of factors that will predict bullet stability for a given barrel twist-rate; bullet length is only one of those factors. Nose-tip design, ogive length, grease groove design and how well the bullet is centered in the bore all have a substantial affect on bullet stability.
_________________
All the best,
DanT "
Conan_568 said:
I guess I'd better download a new BS filter.
Conan,
"Yup, those tables look good, but are worse than worthless; they are dead wrong and could lead a man in the direction of wasting time, money and effort on a inappropriate mold for his rifle.
So far the best method I've found to determine optimum bullet design for match shooting is to use the software developed by Dr. McCoy for the US Army. It is right on for supersonic flight, but needs tweaking for our Pb pills. That being said, after years of using it, it is a very useful tool in the hands of one that "knows how to swing that type of hammer."
_________________
All the best,
DanT