So, I was at my usual spit of crown land firing a couple NR's. And had a little visit from a couple cops in a cruiser that came to investigate based on the call from a passerby. Nothing bad happened, but I did find it interesting.
To describe the parcel of land. I looked it up on Natural Resources and it's listed as Crown Land. On the map it is sectioned off as being 100 m wide and two km long. Now, actually on site, it is evident that I'm not the only one that shoots there, there's sign that others come from time to time. And it's also not 100 m wide... the surrounding farm encroaches a bit.
So the police come and say that someone called in. I said that I believed it to be crown land and was under the impression that it's legal to target shoot non restricteds on crown land, in safety. They weren't certain it was crown land as it just looked like a farm field.
So, I presented them with my printout I keep with me of the map from the Natural Resources atlas that describes the designation of land. With that, they stated they were impressed with my research, and conceded that they weren't certain if it was crown land or not, and that it wasn't the neighbouring land owner who called. They wished me well and left me be to continue shooting.
I guess if there's a moral to the story, it's to keep paperwork on you that will justify your position. But it does seem odd that the authority having jurisdiction isn't aware of what is legal on what land...
Otherwise, if anyone wants to share a good stretch of land (private) that wouldn't mind a responsible shooter to use from time to time... I'm in the market.
To describe the parcel of land. I looked it up on Natural Resources and it's listed as Crown Land. On the map it is sectioned off as being 100 m wide and two km long. Now, actually on site, it is evident that I'm not the only one that shoots there, there's sign that others come from time to time. And it's also not 100 m wide... the surrounding farm encroaches a bit.
So the police come and say that someone called in. I said that I believed it to be crown land and was under the impression that it's legal to target shoot non restricteds on crown land, in safety. They weren't certain it was crown land as it just looked like a farm field.
So, I presented them with my printout I keep with me of the map from the Natural Resources atlas that describes the designation of land. With that, they stated they were impressed with my research, and conceded that they weren't certain if it was crown land or not, and that it wasn't the neighbouring land owner who called. They wished me well and left me be to continue shooting.
I guess if there's a moral to the story, it's to keep paperwork on you that will justify your position. But it does seem odd that the authority having jurisdiction isn't aware of what is legal on what land...
Otherwise, if anyone wants to share a good stretch of land (private) that wouldn't mind a responsible shooter to use from time to time... I'm in the market.