LSS-22 Chassis for Rimfire Bolt Action Rifles

@mossler. So does the Ls 22 stock seem worth the 400$..? Looks like it would be comfortable. Also, where are you buying those scope bases from for the 1710? I want to order a 1710 and I refuse to use dovetail mounts
 
Talley makes a rail for the 64/54 action that you can get through Nordic marksman ;)

The new LSS-22 stocks are very nice. I have been trying to re-inlet one to fit a 1727F action and its causing me grief to take a tool to something so nicely finished! I think I will need to get another for the 64 so I have one that has not been messed with!
 
@Mike112288 Having another rifle in LSS chassis, it would be ideal if one of my 22s was a "trainer" setup.

My MPR sports a pic rail, EGW is memory servers, and I mount various scopes on QD mounts. I am tempted to move the MPR to using Anschutz 6834 sites, which could also spell some trouble with the LSS.

It all feels like I'll need another 22 just for LSS setup and the "22 cabinet" will grow.
 
The ring bases that I use for 64 and 54 are warne Maxima from Midway code 119319.
mpr64_weaver%20mount_IMG_3011_cut_1024.jpg


The shoes on my bipod are "Podpaws".

I hope to be able to show 64-MPR and LSS-22 together in a near future.
 
Last edited:
@tac21. You will make a number of men very very happy. I mean very very happy dang I think I would fly to b.c just to pick it up!! Lol I seriously want my name and info taken down by you guys so that you can notify me. If you do make a 1727 stock I hope it's real soon!! Lol
 
1712 and LSS-22, I've got a winner.

This morning I was in a hurry and weather was colder,
1712_MDT LSS-22_stand100m_20161201_095345_cut_1024.jpg


Despite of this. 110yards, 30 shots group. It began to shine.
1712_MDT LSS-22_cible2_100m_30c299_20161201_100131_cut.jpg



I've received my stock for "1416" aka Match 64. The 64MPR is fitted (nicely), I hope to be able to try it tomorrow.
 
Thank you Pascal for all this information.

I see you are using an older box of SK Rifle Match and it made a lovely group. From the title, I suppose this 54 setup in LSS-22 shoots better then before ?

I mostly run the waxy SK Magazine in my 64.

@TAC21 BTW, does the LSS-22 come ready to mount the night vision mount?
 
@pascalp. I thought the 54 action u have in the mdt chassis was a 1710 heavy barrel! It looks like a heavy barrel to me. I had a 1712 once and it was a thinner looking barrel. Do your u know if a heavy barrel 54 would fit properly and free float proper in that mdt chassis?
 
@pascalp. I thought the 54 action u have in the mdt chassis was a 1710 heavy barrel! It looks like a heavy barrel to me. I had a 1712 once and it was a thinner looking barrel. Do your u know if a heavy barrel 54 would fit properly and free float proper in that mdt chassis?

A Heavy Barrel is no problem and will free float. As long as it is no larger than 1" in diameter at the front of the fore-end of the chassis.
 
MDT LSS-22 and 64MPR tested. Assembling action and LSS is no problem, it fit tight and nicely.

Weather is colder every day, -3°C 27°F. I was obliged to keep gloves, and 2 stage trigger 250g 9oz with gloves is touchy.

16120202340118956014675620.jpg


16120202340318956014675621.jpg


A nice piece of work.
16120202340918956014675624.jpg

The scope is an old Tasco 24x44 with hair-dot 1/8 reticule.

The heavy match barrel, free floating.
16120202340718956014675623.jpg


100m 110y, SK Rifle Match.
16120202335918956014675619.jpg

Not bad for a first day. Not as good as the 54 but weather was colder and gloves didn't help.


To be honest, it's to soon to say how they shoot better than before LSS-22.
The benefit on comfort is great, it tend to make shooting easier. Good hold, positive let off, if the shooter is at work, results follows.
I've a good feeling about the mount quality and obviously it will improve overall performance.
The 1712 barrel wasn't free, now it is.

I had already upgraded the stock of the 64MPR, so difference is lesser than with factory stock.
mpr64_crossetroudepouce_stand_20130526_172810_cut_1024.jpg





Side by side 64MPR and 1712. The 1712 have thinner barrel than 1710, but it shoot so good while being light to carry.
16120202341418956014675627.jpg


A closer view of channels and barrels
16120202341318956014675626.jpg


64MPR and my old 1607 (match grade 54) have the same kind of barrel. Maybe modern 54 have a beefier barrel.
16120202341018956014675625.jpg


Problem with "real" Match 54 is the bulky 5071 or 5018 trigger.
A 5018 and a LSS-22
16120203155718956014675688.jpg


A 1607 with 5071 trigger and a LSS-22
16120203155418956014675687.jpg
 
I am just going to leave this as a teaser till I can get some paint on my grinder marks, lol ...

MDT%20LSS-22%20Chassis%20and%201727F_zps42cb5fpx.jpg


I really hope MDT will do a proper inlet for the 1727F, 1827F and new 1927F when it comes out (one size fits all). That would be a cool way to re-purpose the biathlon rifles too ;)
 
Did u actually chop that stock up dragon dude?!on the flip side that's teasing me like a banshee !! Soon as mdt has a chassis built for the model I'm snatching it up
 
Again, much obliged Pascal for the pictures and commentary.

Speaking of the light to carry 1712, tonight I showed myself how much the MPR is a beast to handle off-hand with a 4-14 30mm heavy glass atop. I need to train my arms if I intend to shoot this way.

I may need a lighter solution for offhand.

Pascal, how balanced is the MPR in the LSS-22 ? Is the PRS buttstock (I presume that is what you have) enough to offset the heavy barrel and gain equilibrium?
 
Did u actually chop that stock up dragon dude?!on the flip side that's teasing me like a banshee !! Soon as mdt has a chassis built for the model I'm snatching it up

I did! My apologizes to MDT for treating a wickedly nice chassis in such a bad way but I did "almost" make it fit. It works perfect but requires too much material off the inside just over the trigger guard to fit the 5020 trigger. Will post more pics when the paint dries and I have it all together. I am rocking a 1727F in a folding chassis :)
 
Back
Top Bottom