Ironic isn't it that a pre-1947 12(7) can live on with our bloodline but a post 1947 12(X) gun is doomed for the smelters!
Bloody stupid laws. And some of the pre 1947 guns are tinier than the new ones!!
12(6) prohib legislation doesn't make any sense, never did, and never will.
It was designed to make 50% or so of handguns prohibited, based upon a study of registered restricted handguns of the time.
Drastically reducing the number of registered handguns in the hands of Canadians was it's only goal.
Thus 4" or shorter barrels and .25 and .32 caliber guns were targeted, probably justified on the basis that these were not target-worthy pistols.
The 4" limitation was designed to encompass as many handguns as possible, and certainly to include all of the pocket autos, and also the extremely common old .32 caliber break-open revolvers that many Canadians had owned for generations.
However, this created a situation where serious Luger collectors with massive amounts of money invested, found themselves in possession of mostly prohibited handguns, with only their longer barreled specimens exempt.
It also meant that police armed with .38 Special police service revolvers, which were mostly 4" barrels, were now in possession of prohibited firearms.
Obviously a 4" barreled Colt or S&W revolver is accurate enough for practical target shooting, as is the .38 special cartridge.
Otherwise police departments would not have issued them to their officers, and required these officers to qualify by shooting paper targets to demonstrate their ability to accurately hit what they aim at.
And, in the end, what possible difference did it make whether a licensed firearms owner possessed a .25 auto or a derringer, rather than a .45 auto or a .44 magnum revolver?
How was Canada a safer place with one type of firearm in law abiding hands, and not the other?