What can your 6.5 creedmore do that my .260 can't?

Actually it doesn't work "better", it may work as good, or slightly worse due to the straight case and sharp shoulder. More taper with less shoulder angle feeds better, this was proven over 100 years ago.
2.8" is 2.8", one has more powder, which makes pew pew go faster.

Another one misses the point.
 
Note usable case capacity (amount that's not occupied by seated bullet)

Code:
Cartridge          : .260 Rem
Bullet             : .264, 140, Berger Hybr #26414
Useable Case Capaci: 46.393 grain H2O = 3.012 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 60000 psi, or 413 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 103 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

23 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Alliant RL26                       101.0     46.4     3.01    2833   100.0    60000   11707   1.104  ! Near Maximum !
IMR 7828ssc                        102.0     44.8     2.90    2758    96.0    60000   11385   1.105  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL17                        90.9     40.8     2.64    2754   100.0    60000   10318   1.119  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL22                       103.0     44.5     2.89    2742    97.4    59064   11360   1.124  ! Near Maximum !
AA MagPro                          103.0     46.8     3.03    2738    93.5    58694   11677   1.147  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Magnum                     103.0     48.0     3.11    2724    97.8    58897   10942   1.139  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL16                        96.9     40.4     2.61    2720   100.0    60000   10179   1.132  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL19                       100.1     42.8     2.77    2711    97.4    60000   10833   1.124  ! Near Maximum !

Code:
Cartridge          : 6.5 Creedmoor
Bullet             : .264, 140, Berger Hybr #26414
Useable Case Capaci: 46.625 grain H2O = 3.027 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 60000 psi, or 413 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 103 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

23 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Alliant RL26                       100.6     46.5     3.01    2833   100.0    60000   11749   1.106  ! Near Maximum !
IMR 7828ssc                        101.7     44.9     2.91    2760    96.2    60000   11448   1.106  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL17                        90.6     40.8     2.65    2753   100.0    60000   10357   1.120  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL22                       103.0     44.8     2.90    2752    97.6    59641   11449   1.121  ! Near Maximum !
AA MagPro                          103.0     47.1     3.05    2749    93.8    59292   11784   1.144  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Magnum                     103.0     48.2     3.12    2735    98.0    59495   11025   1.135  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL16                        96.5     40.4     2.62    2720   100.0    60000   10216   1.134  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL19                        99.8     42.9     2.78    2711    97.5    60000   10887   1.126  ! Near Maximum !
 
It's a mag length issue. The shorter case works better in a 2.8" magazine.

Either case is restricted by the same mag length. Both have the same issues touching the lands if the throat is long. There is no benefit either way. Building a custom, you have options as to how it's throated.
 
It's clear from TB's data that when using RL26 the .260 is more efficient because it uses 0.1gr less powder to achieve the exact same velocity as the Creedmoor. This is further proven by the fact that the same charge of RL17 in both cases will give the .260 a 1 fps muzzle velocity advantage over the Creedmoor.
 
So give me an example where the 6.5CM will provide less "trimming" due to it's design. When neck sizing? Should be the same as there is usually no need to trim neck sizing.
FL sizing? Well that creates head separation since you are creating space for the case to stretch on firing, brass flow which requires trimming.

FL resizing does NOT cause incipient case head separation. Incorrect full length resizing does. There is a VAST difference. I would suspect that you would be very hard pressed to find any competitor anymore that neck sizes as a matter of general practice.
 
Another golden nugget.

“The 6XC (30-degree case shoulder) cartridge came about as a natural progression from shooting the original 6mmX. The 6XC has some features which I feel are more desirable compared to the 6mmX.
The cartridge case body length is 0.023″ shorter than the 6mmX. This means that a 6XC chamber reamer now cuts the base of the case closer to the original .22-.250 base diameter.
Shortening the case body also allows for less longitudinal (length) stretching during fire-forming. This will result in the 6mmXC having a greater case life (more firings).
The 6XC’s 30-degree case shoulder retards case growth (less trimming required).”

-David Tubb
 
FL resizing does NOT cause incipient case head separation. Incorrect full length resizing does. There is a VAST difference. I would suspect that you would be very hard pressed to find any competitor anymore that neck sizes as a matter of general practice.

I neck size just about everything even my hunting ammo and OF COURSE I check fit ! jmo RJ
 
Mark can you run the same data on a 6.5 x55 Swede and a 6.5 PRC PLEASE ! THks RJ

Code:
Cartridge          : 6.5 x 55
Bullet             : .264, 140, Berger Hybr #26414
Useable Case Capaci: 53.358 grain H2O = 3.464 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.150 inch = 80.01 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 60000 psi, or 413 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 103 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

28 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Alliant RL26                        94.7     50.1     3.25    2867   100.0    60000   12959   1.115  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL25                       103.0     50.4     3.27    2836   100.0    58777   12638   1.114  ! Near Maximum !
IMR 7828ssc                         96.7     48.8     3.17    2821    97.6    60000   12953   1.105  ! Near Maximum !
AA MagPro                           97.8     51.2     3.31    2809    95.5    60000   13363   1.120  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL22                        97.6     48.5     3.15    2802    98.6    60000   12845   1.123  ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Magnum                      98.1     52.6     3.41    2800    99.1    60000   12427   1.110  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL23                        99.8     48.0     3.11    2786   100.0    60000   11626   1.128  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL17                        85.5     44.1     2.86    2786   100.0    60000   11471   1.126  ! Near Maximum !

Code:
Cartridge          : 6.5 PRC
Bullet             : .264, 140, Berger Hybr #26414
Useable Case Capaci: 62.379 grain H2O = 4.050 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.950 inch = 74.93 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 60000 psi, or 413 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 103 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

36 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 85%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Alliant RL33                       103.0     64.3     4.16    2960    94.9    58593   16094   1.139  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL25                        98.5     56.3     3.65    2949   100.0    60000   13919   1.116  ! Near Maximum !
Alliant RL26                        89.5     55.3     3.58    2948   100.0    60000   14170   1.130  ! Near Maximum !
IMR 7828ssc                         92.1     54.4     3.52    2927    98.5    60000   14425   1.112  ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H1000                      102.3     58.2     3.77    2924    98.7    60000   14210   1.104  ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon Retumbo                    103.0     59.6     3.86    2923    99.9    55845   14652   1.134  ! Near Maximum !
AA MagPro                           93.1     56.9     3.69    2912    96.7    60000   14911   1.128  ! Near Maximum !
 
Back
Top Bottom