Robinson Armament XCR Revisited

anton520b

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Location
BC
August 09, 2018

This is a personal story on why I chose XCR-M for a primary and the only rifle I own.
Firstly, I have never written a review of any firearms and doing it for the first time to share my own experience with firearm enthusiasts who never held or shot Robinson Armament rifles.

Imagine a scenario where you don’t have the ability, capacity or desire to own more than one rifle, one that you would want to be with you most of the time, to use it in hunting, defence against wildlife, and the one that you would have to trust with your very life if alien or Russian invasion was ever to occur where you would need to spit fire at prolonged defence events., or simply a scenario in which your own wife threatens with a divorce unless you stop collecting and piling up all kinds of rifle models, makes and calibers or numerous other scenarios.

In some of those scenarios, one would probably want a practical, rigid and super-reliable semi-automatic rifle, made of all metal parts and no cheap plastics since you wouldn’t be able to order parts online in such disastrous scenario, one that you could quickly disassemble to a size that would make bullpup style rifles like Tavor look like a cannon in comparison, and pack it in your backpack with no tools, swap barrels on the go (only one Allen Key required) or even calibers like 6.5 Creedmoor to reach out even farther. It would have to be pleasant to carry all day and, to me personally, nice to look at and hold in hands, low recoil and super easy to maintain, disassemble and clean, yes, the weapon system that would grow on you and literally replace all others in one’s vault.

Added bonuses would be its proven record of fastest magazine change, one that will reliably work with all and most available mags that AR-10 or AR-15 could use depending on what caliber you chose. I don’t want to start another “caliber war” but it should suffice to say that for this scenario I have personally chosen .308 Win (7.62x51 NATO) in order to cover more possible roles and target distances.

At first, the idea of obtaining such a weapon system had been pushed under the rag for some future times considering its price and pre-2009 reliability and accuracy issues. That is until I held and shot one purchased by my range buddy who bragged about its 18.6” heavy barrelled XCR-M (made in 2017) and ability to carry it in his backpack disassembled and fully assembled in less than 2 minutes (try to do this with any bullpup out there). Holly Mother-in-Law, there is no such a thing as a perfect rifle but let’s keep on going, wanna know as much about it as possible?!!

OK, I said, it does feel in hands better than any rifle I ever held before (won’t mention any makes and models here in order to respect the owners of those rifles), but a great rifle isn’t only about such nice ergonomics, it’s about what it does on the field, how durable, reliable and accurate it is. “Let’s shoot it!” I said. The results of this quick trial were nothing short of amazing in terms of accuracy and its reliable function; after shooting 100 rds of 150gr Winchester Power Shok and another 100 of reloads without a single hiccup I knew then and there that I must own one of these gems.

Getting one wasn’t an easy task for me when it comes to funds as it required a careful financial planning so I decided to sell quite a few firearms in order to afford it, but if you continue to read you will find out why would I go to such a length to put one of these into my vault, not to mention how happy it made my wife seeing all the firearms gone in place of one single rifle lol. After a careful deliberation, reading all reviews I could find on the net and all youtube videos, countless hours of research and testing many other platforms out there, I have finally decided to order an XCR-M .308 Win with a heavy 18.6” barrel.

Yes, my whole vault is now housing one single rifle which sits there all by itself clean and oiled and ready for any scenario imaginable. Wish I could be this firm and determined when it comes to keeping one single pistol as well, but that is another story altogether as my search isn’t over yet in pistol department.

Disclaimer: I am not affiliated in any way with Wolverine Supplies or Robinson Armament, my observations here are the result of my experience as a buyer, shooter and a passionate hobbyist who wishes to share his experience with folks who are not sure which way to go when it comes to deciding on their primary firearm.

But before I get into my whole experience and detailed review of the rifle, I feel compelled to mention that Wolverine Supply’s stellar customer service further contributed to my firm resolve to obtain XCR-M.

Now to the rifle. As per thousands of happy owners, any and all previous issues have been worked out by RA and all design flaws eliminated while making the platform better than ever before. But hey, those happy customer accounts were not enough for me, I wanted to test XCR-M for myself and once and for all remove the element of doubt.

Fit and finish and strong overbuilt mechanism, build quality need not be even mentioned here, its top notch craftsmanship is a kind that leaves one in owe. Nobody disputes the quality of these tough and well built rifles made to withstand anything one could throw at it in terms of ammo choice, will run steel or brass cased ammo with ‘impunity’.

But, one may think, words are words and mean nothing unless you could prove it otherwise.
How about shooting 10.000 rounds of 7.62x51 Hirtenberger with regular cleaning/oiling schedule? I won’t be an idiot and try to cause deliberate damage to my rifle and see how many rounds can it shoot before malfunction occurs without cleaning. Will leave torture tests for “youtube kids” to entertain their viewers.

Hirtenberger in 308 isn’t a slouch of a round, it is fairly hot as per many ammo reviewers and if something should break on this rifle it should be within 10k of these hotter rounds shot. Being far from any match quality ammo, if I could make decent groupings with this military surplus ammo of, say 2 MOA at 200 yards it would be more than satisfactory in my book.

During the testing, will focus on proper barrel break in, the distance of the ejected brass, brass dings/scratches or deformations, any malfunctions, performance under heat buildup, hopefully shooting 100-200 rounds per range day. During the 10k rounds testing, all malfunctions (hopefully none) will be carefully logged for all readers here and updated regularly as the test unfolds.

After a proper barrel break in the rifle will go through its paces and strings of fire at 5rds intervals will be conducted along with MOA testing on cold and hot barrel.

Stay tuned for part 2 and the commence of 10k rds testing, first results should be updated here within a month.
 
Good on you for getting and liking the xcr. I considered getting an xcr m for a short period of time but it was way too cost prohibitive. That and the limited barrel selection and lack of mlok rails had pushed me to getting a Stag 10 instead. Lots of parts availability and I can just swap out an upper with no tools needed makes the quick change barrel redundant.
 
Good on you for getting and liking the xcr. I considered getting an xcr m for a short period of time but it was way too cost prohibitive. That and the limited barrel selection and lack of mlok rails had pushed me to getting a Stag 10 instead. Lots of parts availability and I can just swap out an upper with no tools needed makes the quick change barrel redundant.

Oh I sure hear ya about the cost, had to take a leap of faith and I'm so darn glad I did but will form a fully "entrenched" opinion after 10k rds test.
About barrels, the selection of barrels is one of the reasons that made me like the platform. For example, for my XCR-M which came with 18.6" Heavy Barrel, I could purchase same length barrel in thinner profile with chrome lining option or stainless steel match, various lengths as well, but I always lean toward heavy barrels as they don't heat up easily and hold zero even under heavy fire, so when it comes to barrel choices I think RA has gone farther than most other companies. Wolverine Supplies now stocks every known part for XCR platform in all calibers and there is abundance of it. Accessorizing your XCR is now possible more than ever before. Stag 10 is a nice choice thou. Cheers
 
The xcr-m was my first rifle and I had one of the early ones. Since then I swapped out the handguard from quadrail to keymod and heavy barrel to light. Made a world of difference for handling. Doesn't get much use anymore but its a great gun and one that I spent a lot of time with.
 
I've shot all the versions of the L except for the new keymod ones and have always liked the rifles other than the less than great accuracy. I wanted one since before they were available in Canada then waited for a couple reviews before buying one. Well I never bought one and always said to myself "when they get it right I'll buy one". I was to the point I was going to give one a try once the keymod versions were out then not long ago I was shopping on the EE and there was a gen 1 quadrail heavy barrel 223 for a deal so good I couldn't say no.

So now I own an earlier release XCR-L and for some reason I like it more than I thought I would considering I was never overly impressed with them before. I've owned most of the non restricted options we've had access to over the last 15-20 years settling on the ACR as my keep it forever at least until something better comes along but this new rifle is pretty darn good and may stay in the collection longer than expected.

Comparing it side by side with my non restricted ACR I still think the ACR is a better rifle but the XCR does have a couple features that it does better. The biggest thing is that it's actually a little lighter than the ACR and the new keymod light barrel version would be noticeably lighter.
The XCR is definitely built tough and so far does not seem to be picky with ammo or magazines just like my ACR that will eat anything.
The ACR is definitely a more accurate rifle with a smoother action but these aren't benchrest target rifles so the difference between one MOA and two MOA isn't really a huge deal and shouldn't be the only consideration when deciding which platform to buy.

Don't waste your money on a 6.5CM barrel for one of these. 6.5CM offers nothing over a 308win inside 600 yards and these rifles aren't accurate enough to shoot beyond 600ish yards. A buddy of mine had an M a couple years ago and the best we could get was about 1.5 MOA no matter how much load development he did, he's a long range shooter that can shoot 1/4 MOA at 800 yards with his 6.5CM so I don't think it was him or his loads.
I doubt very much that anyone is honestly getting 1 MOA from an XCR in any caliber. By that I mean true 1 MOA not a fluke group or two a day. I mean capable of shooting the 1 MOA challenge of 25 shots in a row on one piece of paper all 1 MOA or better.

I can understand financial constraints but it sounds like your wife doesn't want you to have guns, I'd be getting a new wife before I sold all my guns and compromised to own only one. There is no one rifle for all situations no matter how much you try to convince yourself there is. In my opinion these black rifles are not well suited to hunting, yes you can hunt with them and I've done it myself but once you get past the novelty of hunting with one you'll want your bolt action back. I've gone back to hunting with a Remington 700 chambered in 7-08. It's more accurate, cheaper, lighter, and more reliable than any black rifle you can buy and the CO's don't even give you a second look when you're hunting.


The xcr-m was my first rifle and I had one of the early ones. Since then I swapped out the handguard from quadrail to keymod and heavy barrel to light. Made a world of difference for handling. Doesn't get much use anymore but its a great gun and one that I spent a lot of time with.

How did you swap out the handguard? Bought a new Keymod model? Maybe you just worded it weirdly but that sounds a little difficult on a rifle with a monolithic upper.
 
Last edited:
I had a quad rail XCR-M years ago and really liked it. It originally had a heavy barrel, but I swapped it for a light version and loved the way it handled. It was a little fussy with ammo, but the ergos are the best of any black rifle I have owned. Its accuracy was decent enough for what it was and it shot the heavies really well. I would guy another in keymod in a heartbeat if money grew on trees.
 
I had a quad rail XCR-M years ago and really liked it. It originally had a heavy barrel, but I swapped it for a light version and loved the way it handled. It was a little fussy with ammo, but the ergos are the best of any black rifle I have owned. Its accuracy was decent enough for what it was and it shot the heavies really well. I would guy another in keymod in a heartbeat if money grew on trees.

I still need to get my hands on a keymod light barrel model for comparison. I'm going to keep my eyes open in the parts section and maybe try a light barrel to see how much difference there is.

You have the best sig line on CGN. So true and also so sad.
 
I still need to get my hands on a keymod light barrel model for comparison. I'm going to keep my eyes open in the parts section and maybe try a light barrel to see how much difference there is.

You have the best sig line on CGN. So true and also so sad.

Getting more sad every day.
 
I bought a new stripped upper in keymod and new light barrel. Took forever to sell both at a huge loss but the handling is so much better. Traded away an early xcr l with quad rail and heavy barrel and picked up a lightly used keymod light barrel and so much better. Even my friend who is not a fan of the xcr was really impressed with the L with the keymod and light barrel. I feel the quad rail and heavy barrel are just too much for this gun.
 
I liked my XCR-M 308 keymod. I just wish it was more accurate, otherwise everything else was good. Got a POF 308 and HK MR308 after that, didn't miss the XCR-M at all.
Definitely interested to see the results of this 10k round review.
 
I bought a new stripped upper in keymod and new light barrel. Took forever to sell both at a huge loss but the handling is so much better. Traded away an early xcr l with quad rail and heavy barrel and picked up a lightly used keymod light barrel and so much better. Even my friend who is not a fan of the xcr was really impressed with the L with the keymod and light barrel. I feel the quad rail and heavy barrel are just too much for this gun.

Wow that's a lot of trouble to go through but sounds like you're happy with the end product.
I think I would have just sold one and bought the newer one. I'm trying to convince a guy to trade me his Keymod XCR-m with FAST 3 stock but he wants cash more than my trades. I'll find one some day and hopefully it will be a deal like the L I just bought.

I don't think the quad and heavy barrel are too much but I definitely think it would be an improvement to drop some weight. I like how slim the keymod forend is and less weight makes them a lot easier to carry around all day even if it doesn't dampen the recoil quite as much.
 
I liked my XCR-M 308 keymod. I just wish it was more accurate, otherwise everything else was good. Got a POF 308 and HK MR308 after that, didn't miss the XCR-M at all.
Definitely interested to see the results of this 10k round review.

Those are both great rifles but for someone like me who can shoot in his yard as long as it's non restricted the XCR-M has more appeal. I've owned a few 308 class AR's but being restricted really sucks for me.
You really can't or shouldn't expect the same accuracy from an XCR-M that you get from an AR-10, the XCR uses a much cheaper barrel and their barrel retention system doesn't do it any favors in the accuracy department.
I find it more important for a restricted rifle to be accurate because you only shoot it at a gun range so it's mostly from a table these days since more and more ranges won't let you run and gun except during 3-gun (and a 308 class semi is not a good choice for 3-gun). When shooting at my place I can stand and move while shooting so as long as it's better than 2 or 3 MOA I still hit my plates.
If you only shoot at a range anyway then you definitely made the right choice in dumping the XCR and picking up your new rifles but having realistic expectations from a rifle with a rack grade barrel (doesn't matter if it's cut to heavy contour it's still not a match grade barrel) goes a long way towards being happy with your purchases.
 
Those are both great rifles but for someone like me who can shoot in his yard as long as it's non restricted the XCR-M has more appeal. I've owned a few 308 class AR's but being restricted really sucks for me.
You really can't or shouldn't expect the same accuracy from an XCR-M that you get from an AR-10, the XCR uses a much cheaper barrel and their barrel retention system doesn't do it any favors in the accuracy department.
I find it more important for a restricted rifle to be accurate because you only shoot it at a gun range so it's mostly from a table these days since more and more ranges won't let you run and gun except during 3-gun (and a 308 class semi is not a good choice for 3-gun). When shooting at my place I can stand and move while shooting so as long as it's better than 2 or 3 MOA I still hit my plates.
If you only shoot at a range anyway then you definitely made the right choice in dumping the XCR and picking up your new rifles but having realistic expectations from a rifle with a rack grade barrel (doesn't matter if it's cut to heavy contour it's still not a match grade barrel) goes a long way towards being happy with your purchases.

Yea, exactly. I can't shoot in my backyard anyways and the only place I shoot is at the range, so the XCR being non-restricted didn't really bring any benefits to me.
And yea, I kept wondering if that barrel retention nut was at the right torque spec. Bought a digital torque wrench just for it. At first I thought it must be my barrel nut that stripped, cause the accuracy was not where I wanted it to be, so I bought a new barrel retention nut, didnt fix the problem.

I guess for the cost (MSRP not too much lower than a MR308), I expected more.
 
Yea, exactly. I can't shoot in my backyard anyways and the only place I shoot is at the range, so the XCR being non-restricted didn't really bring any benefits to me.
And yea, I kept wondering if that barrel retention nut was at the right torque spec. Bought a digital torque wrench just for it. At first I thought it must be my barrel nut that stripped, cause the accuracy was not where I wanted it to be, so I bought a new barrel retention nut, didnt fix the problem.

I guess for the cost (MSRP not too much lower than a MR308), I expected more.

Did you update your XCR-M with RA accuracy package? Just call Wolverine Supplies and they will take care of you. However, XCR-M is a war/battle rifle designed to go through hell and back and keep on spitting copper even if dirty, muddy, it keeps on when you need it the most (i.e. if you're fighting in Afghanistan for your life), the three big locking lugs on the face of the bolt, yes the indestructible AK 47 bolt!! The "star chamber" would get you killed sooner or later, the only battle proven three lug super beefy chamber is what works regardless of what you put it through...
 
Got the M 308 first and L Comp 223 Wylde second and then 6.5 Grendel both consistently under 3/4 in never fail to feed or eject ,
have an AR that has had more problems any rifle I ever owned
 
I have an xcr-l in 7.62 and all the parts to go 5.56 when I want to the 2 moa is good enough for me. If I need better I have bolt action howetzers. the thing is simple and eats anything it's fed. I have so much crown land around I can be bothered with an ar.
 
Back
Top Bottom