Late to the thread but I'll say as a fellow glock shooter... Even with that kind of corrosion, I doubt you would ever HAVE to change guns in your lifetime. A full small parts kit for a Glock is cheap, especially if just talking springs/connector/etc and no locking block/firing pin/trigger.
I doubt that rust, if even just wiped down daily, will ever actually affect the performance of the pistol in a way to significantly disrupt it's performance. Might look pretty messed up, but I bet it still will shoot better than any of us off hand even 10 years from now.
I also suspect the light strike was from WD40/lube in the striker channel, or just a bad round. Doubt that has anything to do with surface corrosion on the parts. Could go with a "maritime spring cup" (factory part) to help with drainage in the striker channel?
That being said, I also agree that an all stainless .44 might be an overall better gun for these purposes... Though, as others have pointed out, revolvers are much harder to detail strip and clean. I'd definitely go with a Ruger SBH over a Smith as you can actually pop out the trigger group in one piece and there's no sideplates to deal with. I also think they might be better "sealed", not having sideplates or a grip frame to retain moisture around the mainspring...
Weight will always be better with the Glock obviously, too bad the 329pd (featherweight Smith .44 revolver with scandium frame/titanium cylinder) is prohib by 1mm lol.
I doubt that rust, if even just wiped down daily, will ever actually affect the performance of the pistol in a way to significantly disrupt it's performance. Might look pretty messed up, but I bet it still will shoot better than any of us off hand even 10 years from now.
I also suspect the light strike was from WD40/lube in the striker channel, or just a bad round. Doubt that has anything to do with surface corrosion on the parts. Could go with a "maritime spring cup" (factory part) to help with drainage in the striker channel?
That being said, I also agree that an all stainless .44 might be an overall better gun for these purposes... Though, as others have pointed out, revolvers are much harder to detail strip and clean. I'd definitely go with a Ruger SBH over a Smith as you can actually pop out the trigger group in one piece and there's no sideplates to deal with. I also think they might be better "sealed", not having sideplates or a grip frame to retain moisture around the mainspring...
Weight will always be better with the Glock obviously, too bad the 329pd (featherweight Smith .44 revolver with scandium frame/titanium cylinder) is prohib by 1mm lol.