ATRS Modern Sporter... Some Initial Observations

angryeyebrows

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 99.7%
357   1   0
Location
Oscar Mike
I've finally had a chance to get my rifle assembled, after some unforeseeable delays. The original intent was to strip down my AR and swap as many parts over as I could, without incurring too much additional cost. Of course, after building dozens of rifles over the years, I should have known that I would cave and end up buying more parts I didn't REALLY need! Other parts I was simply forced to replace, due to compatibility issues (more on that below). Overall, I'm fairly impressed with the general quality level. The machining looks good to my eyes, and the fit/finish is excellent. Now before getting into what could be perceived as nit picking/#####ing/complaining, let it be known that I'm very thankful to companies like ATRS for making rifles like this a reality in Canada. From a business standpoint, it's an expensive endeavour and with our firearms climate, it is certainly a gamble.

Assembly of the upper receiver group was fairly uneventful. Everything went together as it should. On final assembly, the MRA barrel does make the front end a little heavy for my liking, but I'd rather that, than a super skinny barrel that might not handle a tonne of rounds. This rifle is for training, so maximum reliability is required. Assembly of the lower was less smooth. I tried installing my previous receiver extension/end plate/castle nut combo and found that due to the increased thickness at the rear of the lower receiver, I was not able to screw in my extension enough to capture the buffer detent. My castle nut ran out of room on the extension threads. I believe this was a combined issue of the type of receiver extension (old DD I think) and the slightly thicker Noveske QD end plate. Kind of a pain, but justified the purchase of the excellent PWS ratcheting system, which worked very well. The second issue with assembling the lower was that the pervious bolt that was holding on my BCM pistol grip bottomed out in the ATRS lower, and would not hold the grip tight to the rifle. I tried every old bolt in the tool box, hex head, magpul flat head etc, but none worked. Could have added a washer, but I was intending to try a new grip anyway, so I ordered one and lo and behold, the MOE SL and Magpul's new Dual Drive bolt work perfectly fine. Lastly, when I installed the mil-spec front pivot pin from my old DD lower, I noticed that the pin tip, which usually sticks out the left side a good 1.5 mm or so, was instead recessed. I guess ATRS increased the width at the front of the lower too. It was functional, but a pain in the ass when you can't push it open with just your finger. After some googling, I decided to try the BAD Enhanced Pivot Pin, as they are advertised as having an extended tip. When installed, the pin is about flush, but can be still be pushed/pulled out without a tool. On the right side, there is a slight gap (pic below) where is looks as though the pin could close more, but the little retaining detent has run out of track. When compared to a normal AR lower, the hole in the lower receiver for the detent and spring appears slightly further outward, preventing the shoulder of the pin from closing against the side of the lower. If it could fully close to the proper position the BAD pin would be perfect for the thicker ATRS receiver. Perhaps I can modify the pin.

Once the rifle was fully assembled, and just with some dry drills, I noticed some other areas that will need to be addressed, and some that may or may not be possible to fix. In no particular order:

The sharp front mag well profile - I occasionally grab the rifle at the mag well for shooting in certain positions, but I have found that I quite often handle the rifle by the mag well when I'm not shooting. I don't know why ATRS profiles the front lip of the mag well with such an aggressive edge, but it's going to be zipped off in short order. I thought perhaps it wasn't as sharp in person as it looked in pics, but I was mistaken. Maybe this won't bother some people, but it annoys the hell out of me, so it'll be address. (pic below)

The fence around the mag release - As what seems to be purely a design choice, this area has a very square profile, compared to the standard AR fence. I found that I am constantly hitting the tip of my finger on the fence which forces me to consciously reposition to press the button cleanly. If you have stubby little digits, maybe not an issue. If you have normal sized hands, and are very used to the feel of that button, it might put you off.

The rear of the trigger guard - The machined in trigger guard is nice, but right at the rear there are two tiny points that you might notice when supporting the rifle with just the pistol grip hand, and not wearing gloves. Minor, and will be cleaned up when I get the mag well fixed. (pic below)

The curved profile at the back of the lower - This is also minor, but if you have a pistol grip with a beaver tail, you might have a substantial gap there. It's a little ugly, but functional. (pic below) ***EDIT*** So far this appears to be the case with the Magpul MOE SL. I swapped it out for my old BCM Gunfighter Mod 3 which DID need a washer due the lack of depth in the hole for the grip screw. Overall, the beaver tail on the BCM grip is far better fitting, and the little duck bill that stick out over the back of the tigger guard covers the two sharper points mentioned above.

Relocated charging handle cutout - This may or may not be a deal breaker for me. Once I have a few hundred rounds or so through it and had a chance to do some proper drills, I will know for sure. If you have training you will know that when clearing particular malfunctions, you will pull the charging handle fully to the rear, depress the bolt catch, locking the bolt to the rear, and return the charging handle forward. When you try and return the charging handle forward, it will fight you a little, as the little tabs on the sides of the handle happen to be located right at the cutout in the track inside the upper. I'm hoping some other MS owners will be able to check this out and see if it's an issue with just my set up, or with all of them. Either way I don't like it, and I'll need to see if I can come up with a fix.

My final list parts is as follows and I've noted the parts that were new purchases:

- MRA 18.6" .223 Wylde Barrel with Straight Flutes, Nitrided Black (New)
- 15" BCM MCMR (New)
- Colt Canada Bolt Carrier Group
- Rainier Low Profile Gas Block (New)
- Raptor Charging Handle
- Troy BUIS
- DD Flash Suppressor
- DD LPK
- Geissele Maritime Bolt Catch (New)
- Geissele SSA
- BAD Enhanced front Pin (New)
- PWS Enhanced Receiver Extension (New)
- Colt H Buffer
- B5 Systems Sopmod Bravo Stock
- Magpul MOE SL Grip (New) Replaced with BCM Gunfighter Grip MOD 3
- Seekins Precision Magazine Button
- BAD Ambi Selector
- Gear Dynamics Quick Adjust Sling (Of course!)

Now for the pictures, because everyone loves pictures:

Take Down Pin (Front Pivot Pin Gap)
o0lMYzP.jpg


Sharp Points
ObWUNcA.jpg


Grip Gap
hBKGP67.jpg


Completed Rifle
dLvTsI6.jpg


HMsqy5F.jpg


4MmHuox.jpg
 
Last edited:
How does it shoot ?

I Don't know yet. These are just my very first handling observations. I just got it together and will try and find time to get to the range this next week. I suspect the rifle will function perfectly fine, and I'm honestly more curious about the accuracy of the MRA barrel. Never used one, and the specs seem to be decent. I won't be hand loading, but instead I'll be using regular mil-spec ammo. This build does seem to deserve an optic with some magnification, so I'll see if I can borrow an ACOG or something.
 
Interesting and possibly some valid points. On some it would seem to be a matter of no-one can make an upper or lower that will fit absolutely every other manufacturers parts perfectly. Especially extremely high volume made injection molded parts ala Magpul. I KNOW ATRS has addresses the thickness at the rear of the lower where the buffer tube goes in to accommodate more buffer tubes to allow the buffer retainer to be retained.
I had them mill the retaining slot on the front TD pin a little closer to the end to solve the same issue you have. Once Midwest has some front TD pins available I will be swapping mine for 1.
 
Great review OP, thanks for the share - and dialling up the anticipation for everyone who's got MS receiver sets on order!
 
Interesting and possibly some valid points. On some it would seem to be a matter of no-one can make an upper or lower that will fit absolutely every other manufacturers parts perfectly. Especially extremely high volume made injection molded parts ala Magpul. I KNOW ATRS has addresses the thickness at the rear of the lower where the buffer tube goes in to accommodate more buffer tubes to allow the buffer retainer to be retained.
I had them mill the retaining slot on the front TD pin a little closer to the end to solve the same issue you have. Once Midwest has some front TD pins available I will be swapping mine for 1.

If the upper and lower are made to fit AR parts, they should fit AR parts. All the parts in the world are made to fit the standard upper and lower receivers, so manufacturers make their accessories with the correct dimensions. There really isn’t any excuse as to why a curve/radius/dimension is off with the Modern Sporter. They could have easily made sure that the lowers thickness at the front matched the standard AR thickness, and that the hole for the pin detent was drilled in the exact correct spot. Then there would be no pin issues. On the upper, They could have profiled the very front of the receiver to match a standard upper. Then there would be no handguard compatibility issues. I wanted to use a Geissele MK14 or 16, but someone posted that you need to grind off the anti-rotation tabs. I did see that they addressed the buffer tube concerns...perhaps my next lower will be correct.

Can you show me some pics of your front pin, and the mods they did for you?
 
I don't have that gap with the grip like you do, but I'm also using a different magpul grip and BCM grip. Just the profile of your grip.

I’ll pull the grip off and check my original BCM. If it is indeed the grip, then I stand corrected and ATRS gets a point back...Magpul will loose a point though!
 
If the upper and lower are made to fit AR parts, they should fit AR parts. All the parts in the world are made to fit the standard upper and lower receivers, so manufacturers make their accessories with the correct dimensions. There really isn’t any excuse as to why a curve/radius/dimension is off with the Modern Sporter. They could have easily made sure that the lowers thickness at the front matched the standard AR thickness, and that the hole for the pin detent was drilled in the exact correct spot. Then there would be no pin issues. On the upper, They could have profiled the very front of the receiver to match a standard upper. Then there would be no handguard compatibility issues. I wanted to use a Geissele MK14 or 16, but someone posted that you need to grind off the anti-rotation tabs. I did see that they addressed the buffer tube concerns...perhaps my next lower will be correct.

Can you show me some pics of your front pin, and the mods they did for you?

On all billet receivers there is a good chance the anti rotation tabs will need to be filed to fit the upper. Good God what did we ever do before anti rotation tabs, to me these types of handguards seem like some very poor engineering.
Molded plastics have a FAR greater tolerance from part to part, this is a result of how they are cooled along with how long they are left in/on the mold to cool. I don't like the crappy feel of plastic grips so all of my semi autos have Ergo grips on them and they fit like a glove on all of my Modern series rifles.
The detent pin hole IS drilled in the correct location but the lower is wider as you have discovered, hence your pin being short and the slot in the pin being short as well.
I really do not intent to take my gun all apart just to show you something that should be pretty easy to grasp, the slot in the pin is made longer towards the button end. This allows the pin to move further towards the off side.

The one thing that so many guys just don't get is that these receivers are NOT milspec ARs , they simply allow us to have as close to as possible given the stupidity of Canadian firearms laws while employing most AR parts.
 
On all billet receivers there is a good chance the anti rotation tabs will need to be filed to fit the upper. Good God what did we ever do before anti rotation tabs, to me these types of handguards seem like some very poor engineering.

On a billet receiver, the profile can be ANYTHING the manufacturer wants! No reason that in the first 1/4" it can't match the standard AR15 forged upper profile. Anti-rotation tabs are there for a reason. Earlier FF hand guards did come loose with hard use. The evolution of the hand guard progressed, and now we have tabs. Not a poor design, but a requirement. Look to Daniel Defense on their RIS II and now to Geissele on their MK16 which is on the URGI. Both of these systems were chosen and employed by the US military. You might be the first person to accuse Geissele Automatics of "poor engineering".

Molded plastics have a FAR greater tolerance from part to part, this is a result of how they are cooled along with how long they are left in/on the mold to cool. I don't like the crappy feel of plastic grips so all of my semi autos have Ergo grips on them and they fit like a glove on all of my Modern series rifles.

After comparison, the grip curvature/gap is entirely a Magpul issue, although I seriously doubt that tolerance from part to part is the cause. This is clearly a spec that Magpul has specified in their grip design.

The detent pin hole IS drilled in the correct location but the lower is wider as you have discovered, hence your pin being short and the slot in the pin being short as well.
I really do not intent to take my gun all apart just to show you something that should be pretty easy to grasp, the slot in the pin is made longer towards the button end. This allows the pin to move further towards the off side.

We are talking about two things. One, is the added receiver thickness which does affect the standard pin's ability to protrude out the left side, purely due to the length of the pin, and two, the location of the pin detent hole, which contributes to the pin's final seated (closed) position. In this case, the shoulder on the head of the pin does not make contact with the take down pin hole projections on the lower receiver. This is not an issue with the pin, but with the lower. If the detent hole were in the correct spot on the lower, in relation to the pin hole projections, the pin would fully close, regardless of the overall length. Besides, it is visibly off. (Pics below)

No one is asking you to take your rifle apart. You should be able to easily pop the pin open and see the little detent and the modification that was done to the pin. If it's too much trouble, forget about it.

The one thing that so many guys just don't get is that these receivers are NOT milspec ARs , they simply allow us to have as close to as possible given the stupidity of Canadian firearms laws while employing most AR parts.

These receivers are not AR15 parts, you are correct. However, they are marketed and sold as a DIY set that is to be completed with AR15 parts. One would reasonably expect that normal required parts, like the front pin, would fit perfectly. If as you say they are to allow us the opportunity to have a rifle "as close as possible" to the AR, it's all the more support for the argument that there should be no fitment issues with parts that are designed specifically for the AR15.

Pin Detent Hole in DD M4 Lower
GBJSSGF.jpg


Pin Detent Hole in ATRS MS Lower
55Q2oAK.jpg


Standard Mil-Spec Front Pivot Pin in DD M4 Lower
UeuroER.jpg


Standard Mil-Spec Front Pivot Pin in ATRS MS Lower
Sshegc5.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't have that gap with the grip like you do, but I'm also using a different magpul grip and BCM grip. Just the profile of your grip.

It is the Magpul grip that was creating the big gap...switched it out for my old BCM...added a washer, to address the bolt depth issue. As an added bonus, the BCM has a little lip at the front which covers the little points on the trigger guard.
 
I've finally had a chance to get my rifle assembled, after some unforeseeable delays. The original intent was to strip down my AR and swap as many parts over as I could, without incurring too much additional cost. Of course, after building dozens of rifles over the years, I should have known that I would cave and end up buying more parts I didn't REALLY need! Other parts I was simply forced to replace, due to compatibility issues (more on that below). Overall, I'm fairly impressed with the general quality level. The machining looks good to my eyes, and the fit/finish is excellent. Now before getting into what could be perceived as nit picking/#####ing/complaining, let it be known that I'm very thankful to companies like ATRS for making rifles like this a reality in Canada. From a business standpoint, it's an expensive endeavour and with our firearms climate, it is certainly a gamble.

Assembly of the upper receiver group was fairly uneventful. Everything went together as it should. On final assembly, the MRA barrel does make the front end a little heavy for my liking, but I'd rather that, than a super skinny barrel that might not handle a tonne of rounds. This rifle is for training, so maximum reliability is required. Assembly of the lower was less smooth. I tried installing my previous receiver extension/end plate/castle nut combo and found that due to the increased thickness at the rear of the lower receiver, I was not able to screw in my extension enough to capture the buffer detent. My castle nut ran out of room on the extension threads. I believe this was a combined issue of the type of receiver extension (old DD I think) and the slightly thicker Noveske QD end plate. Kind of a pain, but justified the purchase of the excellent PWS ratcheting system, which worked very well. The second issue with assembling the lower was that the pervious bolt that was holding on my BCM pistol grip bottomed out in the ATRS lower, and would not hold the grip tight to the rifle. I tried every old bolt in the tool box, hex head, magpul flat head etc, but none worked. Could have added a washer, but I was intending to try a new grip anyway, so I ordered one and lo and behold, the MOE SL and Magpul's new Dual Drive bolt work perfectly fine. Lastly, when I installed the mil-spec front pivot pin from my old DD lower, I noticed that the pin tip, which usually sticks out the left side a good 1.5 mm or so, was instead recessed. I guess ATRS increased the width at the front of the lower too. It was functional, but a pain in the ass when you can't push it open with just your finger. After some googling, I decided to try the BAD Enhanced Pivot Pin, as they are advertised as having an extended tip. When installed, the pin is about flush, but can be still be pushed/pulled out without a tool. On the right side, there is a slight gap (pic below) where is looks as though the pin could close more, but the little retaining detent has run out of track. When compared to a normal AR lower, the hole in the lower receiver for the detent and spring appears slightly further outward, preventing the shoulder of the pin from closing against the side of the lower. If it could fully close to the proper position the BAD pin would be perfect for the thicker ATRS receiver. Perhaps I can modify the pin.

Once the rifle was fully assembled, and just with some dry drills, I noticed some other areas that will need to be addressed, and some that may or may not be possible to fix. In no particular order:

The sharp front mag well profile - I occasionally grab the rifle at the mag well for shooting in certain positions, but I have found that I quite often handle the rifle by the mag well when I'm not shooting. I don't know why ATRS profiles the front lip of the mag well with such an aggressive edge, but it's going to be zipped off in short order. I thought perhaps it wasn't as sharp in person as it looked in pics, but I was mistaken. Maybe this won't bother some people, but it annoys the hell out of me, so it'll be address. (pic below)

The fence around the mag release - As what seems to be purely a design choice, this area has a very square profile, compared to the standard AR fence. I found that I am constantly hitting the tip of my finger on the fence which forces me to consciously reposition to press the button cleanly. If you have stubby little digits, maybe not an issue. If you have normal sized hands, and are very used to the feel of that button, it might put you off.

The rear of the trigger guard - The machined in trigger guard is nice, but right at the rear there are two tiny points that you might notice when supporting the rifle with just the pistol grip hand, and not wearing gloves. Minor, and will be cleaned up when I get the mag well fixed. (pic below)

The curved profile at the back of the lower - This is also minor, but if you have a pistol grip with a beaver tail, you might have a substantial gap there. It's a little ugly, but functional. (pic below)

Relocated charging handle cutout - This may or may not be a deal breaker for me. Once I have a few hundred rounds or so through it and had a chance to do some proper drills, I will know for sure. If you have training you will know that when clearing particular malfunctions, you will pull the charging handle fully to the rear, depress the bolt catch, locking the bolt to the rear, and return the charging handle forward. When you try and return the charging handle forward, it will fight you a little, as the little tabs on the sides of the handle happen to be located right at the cutout in the track inside the upper. I'm hoping some other MS owners will be able to check this out and see if it's an issue with just my set up, or with all of them. Either way I don't like it, and I'll need to see if I can come up with a fix.

My final list parts is as follows and I've noted the parts that were new purchases:

- MRA 18.6" .223 Wylde Barrel with Straight Flutes, Nitrided Black (New)
- 15" BCM MCMR (New)
- Colt Canada Bolt Carrier Group
- Rainier Low Profile Gas Block (New)
- Raptor Charging Handle
- Troy BUIS
- DD Flash Suppressor
- DD LPK
- Geissele Maritime Bolt Catch (New)
- Geissele SSA
- BAD Enhanced front Pin (New)
- PWS Enhanced Receiver Extension (New)
- Colt H Buffer
- B5 Systems Sopmod Bravo Stock
- Magpul MOE SL Grip (New)
- Seekins Precision Magazine Button
- BAD Ambi Selector
- Gear Dynamics Quick Adjust Sling (Of course!)

Now for the pictures, because everyone loves pictures:

Take Down Pin (Front Pivot Pin Gap)
o0lMYzP.jpg


Sharp Points
ObWUNcA.jpg


Grip Gap
hBKGP67.jpg


Completed Rifle
dLvTsI6.jpg


HMsqy5F.jpg


4MmHuox.jpg

Thanks for the review, should be able to tweak the machining to address those cosmetic issues on future runs rather easily I would think
 
I've finally had a chance to get my rifle assembled, after some unforeseeable delays. The original intent was to strip down my AR and swap as many parts over as I could, without incurring too much additional cost. Of course, after building dozens of rifles over the years, I should have known that I would cave and end up buying more parts I didn't REALLY need! Other parts I was simply forced to replace, due to compatibility issues (more on that below). Overall, I'm fairly impressed with the general quality level. The machining looks good to my eyes, and the fit/finish is excellent. Now before getting into what could be perceived as nit picking/#####ing/complaining, let it be known that I'm very thankful to companies like ATRS for making rifles like this a reality in Canada. From a business standpoint, it's an expensive endeavour and with our firearms climate, it is certainly a gamble.

Assembly of the upper receiver group was fairly uneventful. Everything went together as it should. On final assembly, the MRA barrel does make the front end a little heavy for my liking, but I'd rather that, than a super skinny barrel that might not handle a tonne of rounds. This rifle is for training, so maximum reliability is required. Assembly of the lower was less smooth. I tried installing my previous receiver extension/end plate/castle nut combo and found that due to the increased thickness at the rear of the lower receiver, I was not able to screw in my extension enough to capture the buffer detent. My castle nut ran out of room on the extension threads. I believe this was a combined issue of the type of receiver extension (old DD I think) and the slightly thicker Noveske QD end plate. Kind of a pain, but justified the purchase of the excellent PWS ratcheting system, which worked very well. The second issue with assembling the lower was that the pervious bolt that was holding on my BCM pistol grip bottomed out in the ATRS lower, and would not hold the grip tight to the rifle. I tried every old bolt in the tool box, hex head, magpul flat head etc, but none worked. Could have added a washer, but I was intending to try a new grip anyway, so I ordered one and lo and behold, the MOE SL and Magpul's new Dual Drive bolt work perfectly fine. Lastly, when I installed the mil-spec front pivot pin from my old DD lower, I noticed that the pin tip, which usually sticks out the left side a good 1.5 mm or so, was instead recessed. I guess ATRS increased the width at the front of the lower too. It was functional, but a pain in the ass when you can't push it open with just your finger. After some googling, I decided to try the BAD Enhanced Pivot Pin, as they are advertised as having an extended tip. When installed, the pin is about flush, but can be still be pushed/pulled out without a tool. On the right side, there is a slight gap (pic below) where is looks as though the pin could close more, but the little retaining detent has run out of track. When compared to a normal AR lower, the hole in the lower receiver for the detent and spring appears slightly further outward, preventing the shoulder of the pin from closing against the side of the lower. If it could fully close to the proper position the BAD pin would be perfect for the thicker ATRS receiver. Perhaps I can modify the pin.

Once the rifle was fully assembled, and just with some dry drills, I noticed some other areas that will need to be addressed, and some that may or may not be possible to fix. In no particular order:

The sharp front mag well profile - I occasionally grab the rifle at the mag well for shooting in certain positions, but I have found that I quite often handle the rifle by the mag well when I'm not shooting. I don't know why ATRS profiles the front lip of the mag well with such an aggressive edge, but it's going to be zipped off in short order. I thought perhaps it wasn't as sharp in person as it looked in pics, but I was mistaken. Maybe this won't bother some people, but it annoys the hell out of me, so it'll be address. (pic below)

The fence around the mag release - As what seems to be purely a design choice, this area has a very square profile, compared to the standard AR fence. I found that I am constantly hitting the tip of my finger on the fence which forces me to consciously reposition to press the button cleanly. If you have stubby little digits, maybe not an issue. If you have normal sized hands, and are very used to the feel of that button, it might put you off.

The rear of the trigger guard - The machined in trigger guard is nice, but right at the rear there are two tiny points that you might notice when supporting the rifle with just the pistol grip hand, and not wearing gloves. Minor, and will be cleaned up when I get the mag well fixed. (pic below)

The curved profile at the back of the lower - This is also minor, but if you have a pistol grip with a beaver tail, you might have a substantial gap there. It's a little ugly, but functional. (pic below)

Relocated charging handle cutout - This may or may not be a deal breaker for me. Once I have a few hundred rounds or so through it and had a chance to do some proper drills, I will know for sure. If you have training you will know that when clearing particular malfunctions, you will pull the charging handle fully to the rear, depress the bolt catch, locking the bolt to the rear, and return the charging handle forward. When you try and return the charging handle forward, it will fight you a little, as the little tabs on the sides of the handle happen to be located right at the cutout in the track inside the upper. I'm hoping some other MS owners will be able to check this out and see if it's an issue with just my set up, or with all of them. Either way I don't like it, and I'll need to see if I can come up with a fix.

My final list parts is as follows and I've noted the parts that were new purchases:

- MRA 18.6" .223 Wylde Barrel with Straight Flutes, Nitrided Black (New)
- 15" BCM MCMR (New)
- Colt Canada Bolt Carrier Group
- Rainier Low Profile Gas Block (New)
- Raptor Charging Handle
- Troy BUIS
- DD Flash Suppressor
- DD LPK
- Geissele Maritime Bolt Catch (New)
- Geissele SSA
- BAD Enhanced front Pin (New)
- PWS Enhanced Receiver Extension (New)
- Colt H Buffer
- B5 Systems Sopmod Bravo Stock
- Magpul MOE SL Grip (New)
- Seekins Precision Magazine Button
- BAD Ambi Selector
- Gear Dynamics Quick Adjust Sling (Of course!)

Now for the pictures, because everyone loves pictures:

Take Down Pin (Front Pivot Pin Gap)
o0lMYzP.jpg


Sharp Points
ObWUNcA.jpg


Grip Gap
hBKGP67.jpg


Completed Rifle
dLvTsI6.jpg


HMsqy5F.jpg


4MmHuox.jpg

The issue with some receiver extensions not capturing the buffer retainer pin is a legitimate issue with the first batch of lowers. However ATRS immediately pulled on their big boy pants and offered a reasonable working solution for those effected. Further to that they rectified the issue by shortening the rear of the receiver on all newer production lowers.

If the takedown pin not protruding out the side of the receiver bothers you it can be easily remedied with something like this:

ar15_enhanced_pin_canada_grande_cfa7073c-15fb-466a-8956-c1bdae83dfb9_7.jpg


The rest of what you perceive as being issues (sharp corners, machining profile around mag release, charging handle cut out location, handguard anti rotation tabs etc...) are not a problem with the product and/or a design deficiency but are merely you nitpicking based on your familiarity with function/feel of the AR15.

You can't expect to buy a totally different product and still expect it to be/feel exactly the same as the one you're used to.

Sounds to me like you want your not an AR15 to still be an AR15.
 
The issue with some receiver extensions not capturing the buffer retainer pin is a legitimate issue with the first batch of lowers. However ATRS immediately pulled on their big boy pants and offered a reasonable working solution for those effected. Further to that they rectified the issue by shortening the rear of the receiver on all newer production lowers.

If the takedown pin not protruding out the side of the receiver bothers you it can be easily remedied with something like this:

ar15_enhanced_pin_canada_grande_cfa7073c-15fb-466a-8956-c1bdae83dfb9_7.jpg


The rest of what you perceive as being issues (sharp corners, machining profile around mag release, charging handle cut out location, handguard anti rotation tabs etc...) are not a problem with the product and/or a design deficiency but are merely you nitpicking based on your familiarity with function/feel of the AR15.

You can't expect to buy a totally different product and still expect it to be/feel exactly the same as the one you're used to.

Sounds to me like you want your not an AR15 to still be an AR15.

THAT is the pin I am looking for and it solves the perceived problem.
 
Last edited:
The issue with some receiver extensions not capturing the buffer retainer pin is a legitimate issue with the first batch of lowers. However ATRS immediately pulled on their big boy pants and offered a reasonable working solution for those effected. Further to that they rectified the issue by shortening the rear of the receiver on all newer production lowers.

Great. Read the same posts you probably read. None of which say anything about carbine receiver extension not fitting. If I recall correctly, the concerns were for rifle buffer tubes not being able to screw in far enough. Their suggestion was to use the expensive JP buffer system or exchange the lower for a future one. As I said in my post, the issue with mine is likely my specific combo of parts.

If the takedown pin not protruding out the side of the receiver bothers you it can be easily remedied with something like this...

Missing the point. I'll try modifying the pin before I put some goofy solution on.

The rest of what you perceive as being issues (sharp corners, machining profile around mag release, charging handle cut out location, handguard anti rotation tabs etc...) are not a problem with the product and/or a design deficiency but are merely you nitpicking based on your familiarity with function/feel of the AR15.

You can't expect to buy a totally different product and still expect it to be/feel exactly the same as the one you're used to.

Sounds to me like you want your not an AR15 to still be an AR15.

Here, we'll just disagree. Let's not kid ourselves. EVERYONE who buys this MS receiver set (and the Maccabee SLR), are doing so because the want the feel, function, modularity etc. that the AR15 offers, in Non-Res form. To say otherwise is just silly... If the AR15 were non-res, this product would NOT exist...
 
Back
Top Bottom