My go to hunting rifle is a Dahlberg 1600 HVA in 6.5x55, it's a dandy handy little rifle, but like I said the one piece ejector/bolt stop is a weak link in the design. For a sub $500 rifle they are a steal of a deal if you like lightweight, accuracy, metal and wood, but I can't deny the BRNO is a better design as much as I like the HVA offerings. OP is asking if the BRNO deserves its higher price tag, and I have to say yes is does, based on the design and build quality it's a better rifle no doubt. They are really nice rifles. Comparing these rifles from the same Era, BRNO was improving their quality, while HVA was looking for cost savings. As for wood there are some nice HVA stocks out there but you have to search, there are more outstanding BRNO stocks, and more often then not you will find really nice wood on these.
You can read about some real life problems with the bolt stop/ejector here
https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/for...ks-wrong-about-Husqvarna-action?highlight=Hva
The 1600 is mostly based on a small ring 98 design, solid left lug with a different bolt stop/ejector cut underneath. It's a small ring 98 foot print if you are ever looking for a stock, 98 triggers, bolt shrouds, cocking pieces all fit these rifles as well, probably some other parts I haven't tried too. I prefer the first model steel trigger guard to the later model painted aluminum castings, they are just nicer. The steel ones are also 98 inlet from memory.
They are a smooth Mauser action, they are strong and made from good Swede steel. The triggers are hunting triggers, even if you can get a Smith to stone it down lighter, there is still an inch of over travel due to converting the 2 stage 98 design to single stage. Barrels are accurate and never had an issue with getting one to shoot.