Emergency Response Team - pics

Your right. I think you should stop wearing your seat belt because the chances of you needing it are......

I agree, there are limit to being cheap in the current situation.
In most industrialized countries, all major urban areas need rapid response force on hot standby 24/7!
In the case of France, it used to be 2 teams of roughly 50 men each on hot standby 24/7 for a total force of 300-500 men.
Anything less is being really cheap: Canada probably needs 4 or 5 teams for a total of 200-300 officers to cover the entire country.
They won't be able to deal with a major coordinated attack immediately but should be able to cover anything else.

Also having highly trained officers going back to regular units is a huge bonus for moral and overall effectiveness of the security force.
The alternative is to simply allow any heavily armed group to take over a major building or installation easily with no possible recourse!
Alex
 
Why does anyone advocate/support the militarization of our police forces at the very same time they are disarming civilians and treating us like slaves?

I don't want your help, probably just toss a flash bang into my babies crib and call it a day...I'll take my chances protecting myself.

Simply the draconian law enforcement goons of an occupying force masquerading as a legitimate government.

Just following orders...

Oh, you're welcome for raping me for taxes and using them to buy sweet ass kit to in the near future point in my face for not handing over my legally owned property...
 
Last edited:
From Northern Manitoba last summer, these guys were among the crew looking for the two murdering little creeps who'd gone on that cross-country spree. I like that the RCMP is gradually 'getting it' that hearing protection while having ears open for potentially important input is actually useful. Might be nice for citizens too, especially while hunting. Even a fairly large bear can be quite sneaky, never mind cougars, and with plugs in the ears that can present considerable danger. Then there's potential damage to a dog's hearing, fellow hunters' hearing...

Canadian_police_with_suppressed_rifle.jpg
 

You assume you have more experience than they do because you have nice kit and watch Larry Vickers videos eh
Do you have combat experience or police related experience in dealing with armed conflicts? Lets here some stories hero.

Mods should definitely close this thread. The lack of respect here is the exact reason why the firearms community is viewed the way we are by the left
 
Last edited:
You assume you have more experience than they do because you have nice kit and watch Larry Vickers videos eh
Do you have combat experience or police related experience in dealing with armed conflicts? Lets here some stories hero.

Mods should definitely close this thread. The lack of respect here is the exact reason why the firearms community is viewed the way we are by the left

Perhaps a review is in order:

9 Policing Principles
1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
2. To recognize always that the power of the police to fulfill their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behavior, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
3. To recognize always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing cooperation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
4. To recognize always that the extent to which the cooperation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
5. To seek and preserve public favor, not by pandering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humor, and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public cooperation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
8. To recognize always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
9. To recognize always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.

Something called Peel's Principals - the foundation of "modern" policing...
 
You assume you have more experience than they do because you have nice kit and watch Larry Vickers videos eh
Do you have combat experience or police related experience in dealing with armed conflicts? Lets here some stories hero.

Mods should definitely close this thread. The lack of respect here is the exact reason why the firearms community is viewed the way we are by the left


Not gonna go into details for you but:

-combat experience: yup 18 months outside the wire doing daily patrols in Kandahar province, have you heard of Panjway District and Mushan ? TF 1-08 and TF 3-10

Policing experience: yup, almost 3 years and absolutly hated it so I went back to the Infantry

That as much details as you’ll get and frankly, I don’t care. I have nothing to prove, especially to some internet tough guy.

Lets hear your background and stories now ?



PS: i don’t watch Larry Vickers and I don’t own "nice kit" because I actually use my gear so it doesn’t stay nice.
 
Last edited:
You assume you have more experience than they do because you have nice kit and watch Larry Vickers videos eh
Do you have combat experience or police related experience in dealing with armed conflicts? Lets here some stories hero.

Mods should definitely close this thread. The lack of respect here is the exact reason why the firearms community is viewed the way we are by the left

I definitely do. Every Wednesday and Saturday I get naked, strap on my combat belt, sharpen my machete then do TACTICAL! forward rolls between the rooms of my house.
 
Not gonna go into details for you but:

-combat experience: yup 18 months outside the wire doing daily patrols in Kandahar province, have you heard of Panjway District and Mushan ?

Policing experience: yup, almost 3 years and absolutly hated it so I went back to the Infantry

That as much details as you’ll get and frankly, I don’t care. I have nothing to prove, especially to some internet tough guy.

Ok so clearly you have some experience and despite how my previous comments sounded, I commend you for that. Saying that, your disrespect towards law enforcement is offensive towards every man and woman who wear the uniform with pride. If you are true on your statement of being LEO for 3 years, you wouldn't make such statements unless of course you didn't leave on your own accord, which from my experience has happened from guys with mil experience who run around with the mind set that they are superior to others.

I mean, please explain to me why you believe RCMP ERT to be "posers" or whatever it is you called them.

Also, was your 3 years of extensive LE experience with Edmonton by chance?
 
Last edited:
Ok so clearly you have some experience and despite how my previous comments sounded, I commend you for that. Saying that, your disrespect towards law enforcement is offensive towards every man and woman who wear the uniform with pride. If you are true on your statement of being LEO for 3 years, you wouldn't make such statements unless of course you didn't leave on your own accord, which from my experience has happened from guys with mil experience who run around with the mind set that they are superior to others.

I mean, please explain to me why you believe RCMP ERT to be "posers" of whatever it is you called them.

Also, was your 3 years of extensive LE experience with Edmonton by chance?


PM me if this answer doesnt satisfy you

My "wannabe" comment stands. I have shot with members of various ERT across the country and I’d say that half of them fit this tag, and the other half actually feels this way. Before Covid shut us down, there was a training camp for Quebec City ERT and oh boy it was attitude time in the gym we shared. So yeah my comment could be interpreted as ignorant, but it based on my experience.

That being said, i have made good friends with a lot of them and they are great guys.

They get good equipement, and good for them ! I wish we could have that gear instead of old used outdated stuff


For my LEO background, I actually left on my own and had to fight to get out of there. I went there with the intention to "serve and protect" and was met with the "lets punish people, give tickets and #### people days". I was not for me and i had to go with grievance and ombudsman to return to the Infantry. If I had lost my fight, I would have quit the CAF instead of sticking around.

Been doing it for 17 years now and still got 8 to go.

I did not serve with Edmondton.



PS: please don’t assume you know me or know about my job/career and avoid making false assumptions like you just did with my "retiring" from LEO.


PS2: you wanted stories ? Here one https://imgur.com/gallery/ZLFyRsm
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom