Why the M1 has not been prohibited:
I was issued an M1 in US Army Basic Training in 1963, and was issued an M-14 (select fire) when I was deployed to Germany five months later.
I'll try to clarify the question for those members who are either too young to remember the M1, or understandably vexed and confused over the alphanumeric codes assigned to these US rifles. The M1 (often referred to as the "Garand") is
NOT prohibited. The "M1A" of which you speak, is an entirely different rifle from the M1. The confusion is understandable, since we're accustomed to having military variants of an original design designated with suffixes like xx"A1", xx"A2", and so on. The "M1" was officially designated as the
"U.S. Rifle, caliber .30, M1" (no dash between the 'M' and the '1').
The M1 is a gas-operated semi-automatic rifle chambered in 30-06. It does not have a detachable magazine, but rather a
fixed internal magazine that accepts an eight round
"enbloc" clip.
It is this unique design that limits the M1 to hold just those eight rounds, and is therefore under the limit of rifles holding ten rounds or less.
The M1 served as the American main battle rifle throughout WWII and Korea. In the early 1960s it was replaced by the new US service rifle, the "M-14".
The M-14 had a replaceable 20 round magazine, and numerous other innovations distinct enough to warrant the new '14' designation. Now here's where some of the confusion may lie: M-14 was the code the US Government gave to the new rifle.
Later on, the newly reborn "Springfield Armory" began manufacturing rifles for civilian use, those rifles being designated as "M1A". The M1A may be considered some kind of 'parallel evolution' following the M1, but they are neither M1, nor M-14
To obfuscate the issue even more, we Canadians are fortunate enough to have/had access to a Chinese version of the M1A called the "M305". This Chinese rifle has the advantage of a forged receiver, over the M1A's casting, and generally considered, with some tweaking, to be superior to the American rifle. And yes, "too bad, so sad" for it too, is on the Libbie's list of evil, killing machines.
So, to conclude and to finish, yes, the M-14, and the M1A are both on Trudy's prohib list, but the M1 is not.
So far....
BTW-- Can you find any SKS on the 'evil' list? I couldn't.
That may be for the same reason as our M1s are not listed:
Internal, non-detachable magazine limited to ten rounds...?
That's a puzzler to me. I thought the SKS was limited to just five rounds. Whud up wit dat??
"Interesting times" in the ebb and flow of gun politics, eh?
It's no wonder we're confused!
