Loons do call while flying... and fawns have four legs and move, so it may have walked into that location when you vacated... possible that it got separated from.the doe and/or the doe was killed (traffic, hunter, coyotes etc...) and the fawn was attracted by your movement in the bush. Guesses of course...
hunting bigfoot
- Thread starter dogger1
- Start date
Loons do call while flying... and fawns have four legs and move, so it may have walked into that location when you vacated... possible that it got separated from.the doe and/or the doe was killed (traffic, hunter, coyotes etc...) and the fawn was attracted by your movement in the bush. Guesses of course...
I agree, based on our experience and love of the outdoors and your right, COVID has us all a little bent. Take care.
Last edited:
RJ
Love this thread I've been interested in bigfoot since I was a kid. Tracks are the best evidence.
The Patterson video is great as well. The way the legs muscles move when bigfoot was walking makes it impossible to be a gorilla suit. Especially in the late 60's. It was a female with the breasts. Doesn't make any sense for him to do a fake like that. Even the way the creature walks it would be impossible to fake imo. Ive never seen anything move like that even in modern monster movies.That video gives me goose bumps.
The Patterson video is great as well. The way the legs muscles move when bigfoot was walking makes it impossible to be a gorilla suit. Especially in the late 60's. It was a female with the breasts. Doesn't make any sense for him to do a fake like that. Even the way the creature walks it would be impossible to fake imo. Ive never seen anything move like that even in modern monster movies.That video gives me goose bumps.
Last edited:
Brutus
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Amello. Ineteresting bit I heard of some wildlife photographer named Ivan Max whom used to work for Walt Disney. After he seen the Patty film about 1969 he said no one could create a suite like that and expect to see leg and torso muscle movement as such on film.
I watched that video numerous times. In slow motion and cleaned up. It's actually more compelling. One of the reasons I think its real having watched tons of fakes and movies. Is the movement is so fluid. Not forced at all. That's impossible to do. Even when it turns and looks while walking., the way the legs and arms swing in a non human way so smoothly.
Species8472
CGN Regular
- Location
- Nipissing Township + 82a
100% my mother in-law.
1960 we moved to a place called Little Long Rapids on the Mattagami River about 50 miles north of Kapuskasing . We went in on logging trains as there were no roads . Our parents built the dams at Little Long , Harmon and Kipling . We left in 1966 . There was a Cree village off the river about 2 miles from where we lived . We got to know them very well . We kids often went to visit an older man who i'd guess was 70 to 75 then and he told us fascinating things about forest fires , caribou that disappeared and the big man we should stay clear of . He said the big man is this high as he held his hand in the air so maybe 7 and half feet and very big , 3 times the size of him and covered in hair except his face . He told us not to walk up behind the big man anywhere and especially down by the river . He said there were 5 with the others smaller than the big one . I saw ancient burned out stumps and by what he said the big fire must have been somewhere around 1900 to 1910 . After that the caribou left . Long after that the big man left . I'm thinking he last saw them in the 1940s but he figured they were still somewhere around but no one had seen them . There was no words big foot or sasquatch and he spoke of them as another kind of people but not Cree . Us kids ran the rivers , creeks and trails for 6 years but never saw one . In my older life now i just can't see there being a real big foot but i can find no reason to disbelieve him . Almost 70 years in the bush in northern and northwestern Ontario and i've never seen any sign but he had first hand knowledge of the big fire and the caribou leaving so why not the big man .
30km up a logging road around Cranbrook BC, 2 am in the morning, game camera mounted over 6 feet high.
Don't know the guy, just a pic of an eye from my buddy who was sent it from a guy he worked with. Some say it was a porcupine? Who knows? My buddy said after this picture from his game cam he refused to go back to the area.
Had an ex BC Game Warden tell me he saw one only once in his lifetime around Crawford Bay BC in a clearing, and a coworker while camping in SW Alberta Waterton Lakes, in the mountains, her group heard strange noises and had big rocks thrown at their tents at 3 am.
Me, never seen a thing after 30 years in the woods, who knows, but none of these three are liars or attention getters, in fact the Game Warden guy refused to discuss any further and said he didn't tell anyone for years....
Lastly, my mother in law who lived in the mountains east of Creston BC, heard her goats going crazy in the barn during a full moon in fall, looked outside and saw something brown turn and walk away from the barn on two legs.
Seriously I sh_t you not on these stories from four different individuals, so take it for what you want, just sharing stories I have heard over the last 40 years.
Looks like black bear eye, I get eye shots all the time. Cranbrook, 2am 6ft high scream black bear. Theyre just smelling the stinky camera. The last thing to my mind was big foot when bears do this so often
Last edited:
Brutus
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Brutus
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
1811 David Thompson then employed by the North West Company, he and his party of eleven were near the Whirlpool River in the Rocky mountains in what is now Jasper National Park. They stumbled across large animal tracks frozen in the six inch snow.
No one could agree what made the tracks. Thompson said perhaps a very large grizzly but his native guide disagreed with him and suggested a baby whooly mammoth. Now you have to ask, what past experience made the guide to suggest this strange explanation?
It was believed the tracks were six hours old moving north to south pretty much perpendicular to thier trek. Dispite the persentity of the Metis and Indian guides to often track and kill animals of opportunity for food, no one volunteered to track it down. So thier westward journey continued.
No one could agree what made the tracks. Thompson said perhaps a very large grizzly but his native guide disagreed with him and suggested a baby whooly mammoth. Now you have to ask, what past experience made the guide to suggest this strange explanation?
It was believed the tracks were six hours old moving north to south pretty much perpendicular to thier trek. Dispite the persentity of the Metis and Indian guides to often track and kill animals of opportunity for food, no one volunteered to track it down. So thier westward journey continued.
diabeticfreak
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- The fields of Ontario
Best comment I've read all day lol.
You can add a fourth. Thanks for the permission on your place by the way. Managed to get a cow near your place but not on it so I guess I owe you some steaks but have to help you eat them
Gotta be honest I am getting a bit tired of people from Ontario telling me about what is and is not in the mountains out west. Seriously, scroll back a few pages and you will see. I, for one don't care how you do it or what you think in Ontario. Despite what you may think it is not the absolute center of the universe. The mere fact a person chooses to live in that dumpster fire almost negates their opinion as far as I am concerned. Now back to the bigfoot stories.
Plus their is second bigfoot and possible a third in the movie. Assuming a broke cowboy like Patterson was able to scrape together enough money for one bigfoot suit I am quite confidant he did not have the scratch for 2 or 3. Also neither him nor Gimlin ever pointed out the second beast. i have heard of the long con but letting it go on for so long you die in the interim is a bit much.
Looks like black bear eye, I get eye shots all the time. Cranbrook, 2am 6ft high scream black bear. Theyre just smelling the stinky camera. The last thing to my mind was big foot when bears do this so often
owl
your sitting in your tree stand/blind or on a five gallon pail from Home Depot - waiting for first light and get your prized buck. You know he's there got camera shots to prove it - he just has to show up and you got him - but this day would be different - you see a glowing object cast shadows of light as you rub your eyes you start to make out a couple of figures about 4 feet tall you would guess about 80 yards away. You slowly raise up your 270 Winchester to get a closer look through your scope - just a couple of greys that's all is what your trying to tell yourself. What will you do? Watch them until they zip off to the North East? and you become the laughing stock for miles around because no one will believe you - or do you place a good shot but where? head/torso? A well placed 130 Grain Core-Lokt Pointed Soft Point surely would take care of business. What will you do is the question?
IvoB. I don't know about Ontario where you are ( although I can guess) but here in BC a hunter is obligated by law to correctly identify his target before he pulls the trigger. Ignorance (or fear) is no excuse.
