When you are buying a No. 4 Mk. I T sniper rifle. is it real? A few key points.

seaforth72

Regular
Uber Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
165   0   1
No. 4 Mk. I (T) rifles are becoming very expensive and this causes several problems. I bought my first set, a mint BSA 1945 No.4 Mk. I (T) complete with No. 8 Mk. I scope case and No. 15 Mk. I wooden transit chest from Lever Arms in Vancouver about 1971. I paid $75.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
  1. Rifle serial number on left side of body usually also marked on left side of the telescope bracket.
  2. Telescope serial number engraved on top of telescope and also stamped into the top of the butt, just below the cocking piece.
  3. Completed sniper rifle conversions almost always have a "T" stamped into the left sidewall after the model designation. This was standard by 1944 for BSA conversions.


Ignorant buyers can buy what seems to be a legitimate sniper rifle or complete equipment set, but which later turns out not to be correct. Sellers, including auctions houses, often honestly believe that they have the real thing and sell with honest intentions. One cannot be an expert on everything.

Fakers however find that they can make a lot of money. The difference is that fakers will add or alter markings and try to deceive a buyer. Here is an example of a real sniper rifle and real sniper scope, but on which a faker altered markings and fabricated a fake rare front sight guard to make it appear to be all original and matching.
https://imageevent.com/badgerdog/britishservicerifles/1933enfieldno4mk1tsnipertrials;jsessionid=netnpedlk1.cow?n=0&z=9&c=4&x=1&m=24&w=0&p=0

The old advice applies "Buy the book, then buy the gun." The topic is very complicated and there are many pitfalls. The most common examples seen in auctions etc. are the 1944-1945 examples made by BSA at Shirley, England. Their wartime code was "M47C" The following points refer to those rifles.

When a No. 4 rifle was converted to sniper equipment, the telescope and its bracket were mated to a rifle. This ensured the greatest accuracy. To keep these parts together in service, the serial numbers were cross-referenced on the equipment.

If there is no "T", and/or if the numbers are not as described, then "Caveat emptor" (Latin for "Buyer beware"). At that point, take off your "rose coloured glasses", keep your wallet closed, and seek expert advice.


The telescope's serial number was stamped into the wood on top of the butt, just below the cocking piece. This seems to have been the practice since the first conversions were done in 1941, including those converted from 1930s Trials rifles.
  • Only after the process was completed with a bracket and telescope fitted to the rifle, did it became a No. 4 Mk. I (T) and a letter "T" was stamped into the left sidewall, officially changing the model designation of the rifle.
  • The highest telescope serial number that one can expect to see on a British No. 4 Mk. I (T) is about 29,000.
  • If there is no telescope serial number, but there is an "S51" stamped on the underside of the butt, you can expect that there will not be a "T" stamped into the left sidewall of the rifle after the model designation. These were unfinished conversions, called No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE). Holland & Holland, which did most of the British sniper conversions, had the wartime code "S51". Their first phase was to fit the scope pads and cheek rests. Evidence indicates that the rifles were then held until the personnel fitting the telescope brackets and scopes could do the second phase. Most of those No. 4 Mk. I or Mk.I* (T. LESS TELESCOPE) rifles were 1941-1942 dated Stevens-Savage rifles, apparently shelved once the decision was made to only convert BSA made rifles. H&H could then know exactly what to expect for quality, dimensions etc. At the end of the war, when the contract ended at a certain time, it was "down tools lads as the government is not paying us to finish these." Unfinished conversions, which now included BSA at this time, were returned to the British government. It is thought that there were perhaps about 3,000 unfinished conversions, both 1941-1942 and 1944-1945 production. These rifles are usually found in excellent condition as most sat in storage, unused, until they were sold surplus. The danger here is that anyone can stick an orphaned original scope and bracket, or a replica set, on. It will fit, but it is not collimated with the barrel. There is no problem with an owner doing this, though buyers need to be careful. The replica/fake scopes being made now usually have a WWII date and serial number, so be very careful. Fakers love the unfinished conversions and when they add a telescope set, they sometimes add FAKE numbers on the top of the butt below the cocking piece. An example has a mismatched scope set and the faker stamped the bracket's rifle number into the butt instead of the telescopes's serial number.
  • If the telescope was later changed in military service, the old number would be struck out and the new number struck in adjacent to it.

The bracket which holds the telescope was carefully mated to a rifle. Most will be found with the serial number of that rifle permanently marked on the left side of the bracket.

One of the best indicators of an authentic set are a No. 8 scope case as the British examples had both the rifle and the telescope serial numbers marked on them. Some No. 8 Mk. I (steel) and Mk. 2 (canvas) telescope cases have had fake markings applied or altered by fakers, but it is yet another area where a faker can go wrong. A faker not only has to reproduce the markings, but also age everything appropriately.

Many of the No. 4 Mk. I (T) sets sold in North America have mismatched scope sets. Apparently some surplus dealers stored the scope sets separately from the rifles and when selling them, did not ensure that the correct scope went with the rifle. Original matching sets are more valuable for collecting and for shooting and command higher prices.

The wooden transit chests are NOT usually permanently marked with the rifle and scope serial numbers. Exceptions are few. Normally they simply had a paper label at one end of the chest with the rifle serial number pencilled or written in ink. This way the chest could be reused to ship another rifle back for repairs etc. and all the QM staff had to do was change the paper label.

Early conversions are more difficult to verify as markings were not standardized. Long Branch conversions are dealt with in Clive Law's book WITHOUT WARNING. Stevens-Savage conversions are the most tricky because someone finds a Stevens-Savage No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE) which is already half-converted by Holland & Holland, and just adds a scope set and perhaps fake markings.

Reminder: BUYER BEWARE! Do your homework when buying a No. 4 Mk. I (T) sniper rifle.

Recommended books:

THE LEE-ENFIELD by Ian Skennerton (2007)
THE BRITISH SNIPER by Steve Houghton (2018)
WITHOUT WARNING by Clive Law (2004) (often available at hobby stores)

Out of print books and hard to find books such as:
THE BRITISH SNIPER by Ian Skennerton (1984)
AN ARMOURER'S APPRENTICE by Peter Laidler & Ian Skennerton
TELESCOPE SIGHTING No. 32 by Peter Laidler

There are some good articles on the Internet:
4(T) Or Not 4(T) That Is The Question http://www.warpc.org/our-collection/4t-or-not-4t-that-is-the-question/

Milsurps.com Knowledge Library
https://www.milsurps.com/content.php?r=120-united-kingdom
 
Last edited:
I felt it the article was needed. At least two people are currently (6 OCT 2021) bidding on a No. 4 Mk. I (T) set in Canada which has a FAKE number 35### stamped into the butt. That has permanently damaged the rifle. There does not appear to be a "T" so the rifle is most likely an unfinished one, i.e. a No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE). Judging by their bids, they may think that it is an all original and complete set. :-(
 
There are genuine T less rifles out there that were converted post war for use in British Army service. Look for the rifle's serial number stamped into the scope bracket, that was a post war thing done. However completely ruined when someone decides to stamp the number on the butt stock wrist, or worse, the T on the receiver side, undoubtedly cannot replicate the original stamping, and devalues the package forever. On another note, one of the more interesting videos I have seen shooting the No. 4 T here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbIcYcUJCpg
 
The humpers are getting better all the time and it is getting harder to ID a composite unit.
Normally what is happening as the majority of No.4 T rifles in Canada are not matching: scope and rifle as originally as set up by Holland and Holland
The scope mount is being renumbered and the scope number on the wrist of the pistol grip is being removed and re stamped.
Completely matching units are not the norm in Canada, as for some reason the scopes came in one Container and the rifles in another.
When the wholesalers sold them off it was 10 rifles and 10 scopes or whatever the customer ordered.
Some dealers were able to dig into the container of scopes and rifles to find matching units but the majority did not, as time is money.
A few of the smaller importers took the time to match up all the rifles and the scopes they purchased.
There you have the whole story and why we have enterprising people matching them up now. The matching outfits command a better price.
Do they shoot better...not in my experience and I have played with more than a few.
As the rifles were all done by Holland and Holland (if marked on the butt S 51) the match of scope and rifle is extremely close.
I have set up a large number of both matching and none matching units and not found any gross accuracy errors in any of the miss matched units over the matching.
They were all done on the same lathe mill combination machine and were all set to within the same accuracy level when they left the works.
 
Wheaty: That probably answers a question I've had about what armourers did to match a used bracket that was being moved to another "T". Likely nothing other than checking the collimation and then stamping the new rifles number on it. The bracket on my T is on it's third rifle.

milsurpo
 
I have one in the collection that has so many scope changes stamped in the butt wood where it fits into the butt socket, it looks like a bingo card.
I never knew they stamped that many numbers hidden under the metal in my life, and I have owned a #### load of No.4 T's over the years.
If you can get the rifle before putting down some long hard cash and get permission to remove the butt or have the owner or seller do it and you will find the scope number there...
now the humpers will be doing that!!
When I rebuild or repair a No.32 scope and set it up on the original mount, they are normally within the 3 inches at 100 yards + or - when put back on even an un-matching rifle/scope combination.
Since all the original T's were set up on the same machine it is just amazing how close they are.
I've played with enough 4 T's over the past 60 plus years to be able to speak with some background knowledge on them.
 
Currently sitting at $6500 and $9500 in the Switzers Auction for the two snipers...

Auctions are rarely boring. I once said to a friend, now passed, "it's interesting to see the value of items" and he corrected me and said "it's not the value, it what people will pay".
 
Currently sitting at $6500 and $9500 in the Switzers Auction for the two snipers...

Auctions are rarely boring. I once said to a friend, now passed, "it's interesting to see the value of items" and he corrected me and said "it's not the value, it what people will pay".

The more expensive one sold for $14K, a little too rich for me. Nonetheless looks like I got a nice Ross for a very fair price and for what might be even less(even with the taxes, shipping and buyer's premium) than the typical EE market price.
 
The more expensive one sold for $14K, a little too rich for me. Nonetheless looks like I got a nice Ross for a very fair price and for what might be even less(even with the taxes, shipping and buyer's premium) than the typical EE market price.

Well done!
 
Wheaty - did you say "scope number stamped under the butt socket"? Don't you mean "serial number"? Seen this on Brits? Not on Long Branches ?
 
Last edited:
If a brit sniper is worth 14 grand how much is a L42 sniper?? Or a Long Branch sniper???. Maybe only 30-40 L42's in the country!
 
There are genuine T less rifles out there that were converted post war for use in British Army service. Look for the rifle's serial number stamped into the scope bracket, that was a post war thing done. However completely ruined when someone decides to stamp the number on the butt stock wrist, or worse, the T on the receiver side, undoubtedly cannot replicate the original stamping, and devalues the package forever. On another note, one of the more interesting videos I have seen shooting the No. 4 T here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbIcYcUJCpg

As far as I know, there were no No. 4 rifles converted to (T) by the British after the war-time contracts ended, although it is reported by Wheaty that Canada assembled a few post-war. There is no simple known way to distinguish between a wartime conversion and a post-war conversion, except for those done by Israel, and other countries. Remember that there were thousands of these No. 4 (T) rifles sitting in stores in peacetime up to the 1960s. It is possible that armourers took an occasional No. 4 Mk. I (T) LESS TELESCOPE rifle to replace a damaged rifle and moved a scope set over. At that point they may or may not have added the requisite markings. The rifle serial number being placed on the scope bracket is usually stated as being done post-WWII, however Canadian made No. 4 (T) appear to have had the serial number of the rifle on the bracket from at least 1944. I suspect that the British also started doing it before the end of the war.

The old serial numbers on a bracket or wrist were supposed to be cancelled.

Certainly adding any "missing" markings after the rifle leaves the service is terrible because permanent damage is done to a rifle.
 
Steve Houghton’s recent in-depth book "The British Sniper" discusses the "T" less sniper rifles. They exist and are legitimate British post war conversions, but not common.
 
Steve Houghton’s recent in-depth book "The British Sniper" discusses the "T" less sniper rifles. They exist and are legitimate British post war conversions, but not common.
There is too much over simplification going on. "T" less rifles and "post war conversions" are really different things.

The "T" receiver side marking did not become standardized until late '43 /early '44 for Brit conversions. Long Branch was censured by the UK inspectors for not marking their receivers "properly" (and no cheek piece, lense cleaning cloth ect.). LB complained in writing in return that they had not been instructed to (circa early 1944).

"Post war conversions" refers to British (and Canadian) No4 T rifle conversion contracts which had not been completed by contract cancellations (approx. Oct 1945) which were allowed to run thru into 1946.
On the British side, they completed rifles, but did not fit scope rings to all of them.
On the Canadian side, they finished fitting the scopes (No32Mk3 90L and according to rumour No32TP 74L) well into 1946 -

Rumour says the 74L rifles maybe as late as 1950...but personally I think that is BS.
 
Back
Top Bottom