IN-STOCK: All-New TYPE 81 SR

JasonLiu said:
I went to the TMSA range #1 last weekend and here is my quick video firing my SR. The target is at about 40m (forgot to bring my rangefinder). Surplus ammo come with the VZ-58. I got a hundred or so left.

I used two sheets of paper towel to wrap around the scope so that the ejected case will not damage the scope surface.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADOZtYkR6-I
Click to expand...

Nice video!

In-thread:
JasonLiu said:
Click to expand...

I noticed you were able to ride the recoil in position and do a couple of nice double-taps. Do you find the longer piston makes for smoother recoil then on the rifle or LMG? Thanks!
 
JasonLiu said:
I went to the TMSA range #1 last weekend and here is my quick video firing my SR. The target is at about 40m (forgot to bring my rangefinder). Surplus ammo come with the VZ-58. I got a hundred or so left.

I used two sheets of paper towel to wrap around the scope so that the ejected case will not damage the scope surface.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADOZtYkR6-I
Click to expand...

As a former competitive triathlete, I think the inner-tube of a road bike, cut down to about 2-3 inches, would make a great shell deflector - just roll it on over the scope shade and voila!
 
Trying to avoid any cosmetic marks on the finish? Just curious, I don't think an ejected casing would effect the integrity of the optic but I also have never used this type of kit I don't know how well it'd hold up or not first hand, which is an interesting point in itself .. optic seems solid I guess now mine arrived but I can best describe it's construction as janky.. going from quality glass and mounts to these weird contraptions is funny
 
CaseyK said:
Trying to avoid any cosmetic marks on the finish? Just curious, I don't think an ejected casing would effect the integrity of the optic but I also have never used this type of kit I don't know how well it'd hold up or not first hand, which is an interesting point in itself .. optic seems solid I guess now mine arrived but I can best describe it's construction as janky.. going from quality glass and mounts to these weird contraptions is funny
Click to expand...

It’s my first Russian scope too, well third actually, but the first that falls into this weird category. It’s charmingly steampunk. I really like it, especially the 1970’s rubberized toggle switch.
 
Ustauk said:
Nice video!

In-thread:


I noticed you were able to ride the recoil in position and do a couple of nice double-taps. Do you find the longer piston makes for smoother recoil then on the rifle or LMG? Thanks!
Click to expand...

The differences are negotiable to me comparing with a LMG. I will do a video comparison sometime soon since my friend has one. A muzzle brake will make a bigger change on the recoil. But even without a muzzle brake, the recoil is still manageable.
 
JeffMan said:
As a former competitive triathlete, I think the inner-tube of a road bike, cut down to about 2-3 inches, would make a great shell deflector - just roll it on over the scope shade and voila!
Click to expand...

That should work. I was using paper towel to wrap it around and worked great.
 
Nice video! I found when I was just checking out the scope I preferred it without the rubber eye piece, I wear prescription glasses and I found it was a little annoying pressing into it to get a proper picture, maybe if I pressed it on a little further it may have been better not sure.
 
Emshey said:
Nice video! I found when I was just checking out the scope I preferred it without the rubber eye piece, I wear prescription glasses and I found it was a little annoying pressing into it to get a proper picture, maybe if I pressed it on a little further it may have been better not sure.
Click to expand...

Good point ! With shooting /prescription glasses on that'll be tough and awkward to use the rubber eye piece.
 
Ah perfect I see it !

Also, has anyone been able to figure out the diopter adjustments? The reticle markers are a bit fuzzy, and the manual didn't label the diopter adjustments (or maybe I'm just blind)
 
AccountantWhoLovesGuns said:
Ah perfect I see it !

Also, has anyone been able to figure out the diopter adjustments? The reticle markers are a bit fuzzy, and the manual didn't label the diopter adjustments (or maybe I'm just blind)
Click to expand...



I think this is a case of multiple models in one manual, and a missing note. There's no perceivable diopter on the PO4-01-1 that's the model right?
 
Yeah I think you are right, it seems that only models with a "D" have a diopter.

Kind of annoying that there isn't one. I have a hard time getting my eyes to focus on the reticle at closer distances (sometimes my eyes focus on it and sometimes they can't).

At longer distances + red illumination, my eyes focus on the reticle better.
 
I have an older NPZ scope I got at a gunshow. On it there is a set screw to loosen and then the entire eyepiece bell can be rotated to adjust the diopter.
I just got my packages and this scope does NOT seem to have that adjustment. Fortunately for me the reticle is clear.
This might be similar to certain older fixed power scopes that also have no diopter adjustment.
 
IMG_20221017_141544.jpg
Added the TNA Fake suppressor
Looks Long!:cool:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20221017_141544.jpg
    IMG_20221017_141544.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 338
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom