Glock & 1911 Dropped from a 20 Story Tower: Which One Survived?

His channel has averaged roughly $160k a year over the last decade.
Actual income is higher for the more recent years.
He shoots and reviews guns for a living and it looks super fun.
You both watched the video.

Who's retarded again?
Loosen up a little.
Shooting is only a small part of making content videos. Being a YouTube ain't be all end all. All the travel, all the hoops to jump.thru for video to be monitized, dealing with the mental breakdown, the hate etc. Look at alot of the gun youtubers, they're slowly not enjoying it.

So who cares they make 160k, way more work behind the scenes than shooting guns.
 
Shooting is only a small part of making content videos. Being a YouTube ain't be all end all. All the travel, all the hoops to jump.thru for video to be monitized, dealing with the mental breakdown, the hate etc. Look at alot of the gun youtubers, they're slowly not enjoying it.

So who cares they make 160k, way more work behind the scenes than shooting guns.
You are entirely missing the point, and making it at the same time.
a few hundred bucks for some pistols possibly being ruined is just another business expense.
No one is forcing him to feed his channel, so he must love it above all.
 
haha, can't get anylooser.
His channel has averaged roughly $160k a year over the last decade.
Actual income is higher for the more recent years.
He shoots and reviews guns for a living and it looks super fun.
You both watched the video.

Who's retarded again?
Loosen up a little.
Lol, he might be a hero to you but he makes money for clickbait like this video. And how would one know the video is retarded unless one watched it first? Are you Millenial?
 
Lol, he might be a hero to you but he makes money for clickbait like this video. And how would one know the video is retarded unless one watched it first? Are you Millenial?
You sound frustrated by a stranger online who is a fellow gun nut, can afford ruining a pistol as a business expense to make a video hundreds of thousands of people will watch with interest, and making money with it. That frustrates you enough to tell everyone here how you feel.
Now you are trying to insult me. You're gonna have to do much much better than try to guess which generation I am.

Tell us more!
 
Here is my response to post #29

You have to reach a very low point to start name-calling and blaming entire generations.
 
Last edited:
You have to reach a very low point to start name-calling and blaming entire generations.
I'm the youngest pensioneer in my area by at least 25 years. So I see alot of stuff by the older generations. All I can say from my experience, they don't have much to talk about. There are many within their generation that are worse than those that blame millennials.
 
Carried one for 15 yrs. Put over 35K rounds thru it without one fail to feed; fire; extract or eject.

I must've had a different experience with them than you.

------------
NAA.
I agree with lack of issues. It's the ak of the handgun world. I personally still dislike them. The polymer just rubs me the wrong way. Plastic shouldn't have any integral business on a handgun. Ever.
And the lack of weight makes it jump and snap uncontrollably. Not a fan at all.
And to top it off, it's ugly as sin. Like a cyber truck of the handguns. No finesse or esthetically pleasing lines or input.
 
I agree with lack of issues. It's the ak of the handgun world. I personally still dislike them. The polymer just rubs me the wrong way. Plastic shouldn't have any integral business on a handgun. Ever.
And the lack of weight makes it jump and snap uncontrollably. Not a fan at all.
And to top it off, it's ugly as sin. Like a cyber truck of the handguns. No finesse or esthetically pleasing lines or input.
You'll get no argument from me on whether a Glock should ever be a contestant in a pistol beauty contest.

While I've never looked at one with a view that it was any more than a 'tool', I do totally respect it for it's practicality.

Most of my experience with them is in .40 S&W. I didn't find the lack of weight in the polymer frame was a disadvantage to being able to put rounds accurately on target when needed/desired. That lack of weight was however appreciated especially when carrying concealed.

Cheers.

------------
NAA.
 
Back
Top Bottom