22 lr rifle setups

[wallz]

300 yards with a .22 RF?

Are you an ant looking to move a rubber tree?

What you wish to try is not a beginners move nor is the resultant equipment what one would call entry level.

Maybe try hooking up with seasoned shooter and try your luck at 1/10 the distance and see for yourself that the intended game is much more difficult than you could imagine.

LOL! You need to get out there in life and have some FUN and new experiences. I was shooting out to 500m on a regular basis with my 22. Not at the gongs, because you don't even hear them or see them move at that distance. Just aiming for the rocks on the berm, or the orange clays. Pretty amazing with the consistency you can get out there when there is no wind to deal with.

I also have a CZ 457 and shoot regularly at gongs at 300m using cheap and plentiful CCI standard.

It is a lot of fun. I can shoot, rack the bolt and have a new round ready to go before I hear the report from the steel!

Aint that the truth. Last I was using the anny 1727, and had another round in before the bullet made it out to 500 m, forget about the sound coming back.

 

[Mysticprecision]

From what I have done using factory rifles that you can likely buy....

Least money but most potential variable and definitely need a bit of TLC, Scorpio EM322A (long barrel version) with threaded muzzle. Played with a number from a few years back. They shot very well, functioned well once TLC was applied. SK Rifle match was what mine most often liked and 300yds with great accuracy was no problem. For best results, add a tuna can and run Lapua CenterX.

CZ457 MTR with varmint barrel, match chamber and threaded muzzle. SK Long Range seemed to work well in several of these examples

If you already have a 10/22, rebarrel with a match chambered HB with the right specs and no issue reaching 300yds with very consistent accuracy.

If you have access to factory rimfires from years ago, I would just see how they shoot. Many from decades back shoot really well..... mossbergs, Rems, Wins, CILs depending on model and specs might do all you want. Savage MKIIs can be really good but QC varies so be prepared for TLC.

For optics, I would lean you to 34mm tube scopes with 30 to 32 MILs of travel (or MOA equivalent), canted rails and/or rings with shim inserts.

Test at 100yds to start, confirm at 200yds... send it to 300yds.

Was shooting out to 500+ back in 2018/19 and things have only gotten better understood since. Ammo matters and for best results, it will get expensive.

enjoy

Jerry

 

[Sniffer]

Vudoo V22

Good looking gun.

I am a 457 guy but I now see CZ in a different light and would be looking at options like this moving forward.

 

[Sniffer]

LOL! You need to get out there in life and have some FUN and new experiences. I was shooting out to 500m on a regular basis with my 22. Not at the gongs, because you don't even hear them or see them move at that distance. Just aiming for the rocks on the berm, or the orange clays. Pretty amazing with the consistency you can get out there when there is no wind to deal with.




Aint that the truth. Last I was using the anny 1727, and had another round in before the bullet made it out to 500 m, forget about the sound coming back.

Thats impressive.

I tried 400M but had two issues. I ran out of scope elevation (relatively easy to fix) and found that consistency really took a dump. At 300M it was very consistent but beyond that it seemed to die. Maybe I will try again with a better scope.

Shooting 22LR at these distances is a great way to learn about the effects of wind.

 

[Max Owner]

I'd say CZ but can't recommend them anymore for their participation in the gun grab.

Savage or Tikka. Get a 30 moa rail and an Arken 34mm tube. That'll likely get you even further out. Standard velocity ammo.

I do agree with you about CZ and the gun grab. But I look at is as I’m not forcing my thoughts onto someone else. And looks like you are doing the same, Kevin.

 

[marshall]

Hello there everyone I am looking at potentially buying a 22lr for shooting at the range. I am maxed out there at 300yards and id like to reach out there and shoot the gongs out there. What should I get for a Rifle. I already have a scope just been debating on a rifle wanting some others opinions. Any and all advice is appreciated!

I had a sako finnfire heavy barrel bolt action with a 6500 elite scope that would be close to that , I shot in the 200 + range OK. Gophers.
If I could see them , usally hit, never really measured, but the gun was set up at 0 @150 That scope had lots of range with mil dots .
It would have been made 30 yrs ago I suppose. New stuff I don't much info, other the stay away from light cheap plastic.
I also shot lots of old Bruno #3, 4's that where great rifles, use to be 300-400 , but these days would be 2x that. those are 1950's guns.
Learn to shoot good is more important then the rifle if you are starting out.
I would stay away from Ruger 10/22's as most don't shoot all that great, unless they have custom every thing done. Some here just fell off their chair. I don't really care. everyone had their tests.

 

[gorby]

I also have a CZ 457 and shoot regularly at gongs at 300m using cheap and plentiful CCI standard.

It is a lot of fun. I can shoot, rack the bolt and have a new round ready to go before I hear the report from the steel!

Sweet, haha. It does take awhile to hear the impact.

I have had good luck with both CCI Standard and Norma Tac.

 

[Redneck Hippy]

In my mind this is more of an ammo question than a rifle question. Hitting the 8” gong at 300m is pretty easy with premium ammo once you are dialled in and there is no wind haha.
I’ve done it with all my .22’s except the short barrel 10/22, just haven’t it tried yet.

Get a rifle you like, put your scope on, load up some SK Long Range to start with then go from there. A 20 MOA rail will make your life easier.

Curious what is the scope you have?
Side parallax and easy to dial turrets are not strictly necessary but sure makes it easier

 

[Steiner]

I think CZ has now backed out of the gun grab?

 

[wallz]

Thats impressive.

I tried 400M but had two issues. I ran out of scope elevation (relatively easy to fix) and found that consistency really took a dump. At 300M it was very consistent but beyond that it seemed to die. Maybe I will try again with a better scope.

Shooting 22LR at these distances is a great way to learn about the effects of wind.

I was using the zies LPR S3, with a 20 moa rail.

You learn quickly your scope capabilities when you reach out there with a 22lr, and learn the short comings of glass quality, and turret capacity.

I built this one with the hopes to go far, and bought the appropriate scope with this in mind.

 

[Beeron]

I think CZ has now backed out of the gun grab?

based on what?

 

[Mysticprecision]

Thats impressive.

I tried 400M but had two issues. I ran out of scope elevation (relatively easy to fix) and found that consistency really took a dump. At 300M it was very consistent but beyond that it seemed to die. Maybe I will try again with a better scope.

Shooting 22LR at these distances is a great way to learn about the effects of wind.

what you have experienced is the same problem that centerfire ELR shooters have to solve when shooting to distances like 2miles. Rimfire ammo just put hard limits to what any shooter can adjust. eventually, there will are hard limits to what you can delay through rifle set up... but new ammo is coming out all the time that might help push that 'wall' further out.

There are rimfire shooters who have reached 1000yds with some semblance of directed fire. Lots of problems that far out but there are attempts to solve this riddle.

Below 600yds was as far as my interest and wallet would allow... was getting a wee bit too random for me.

Jerry

PS, Canadians were the first to develop PRS rimfire competition where shooters had to engage targets out to 450yds. And we did hit targets that far out.

 

[Bile]

Savage Mark II TRR-SR - .22LR, 22" or a cz457??( i think is called) those are also really good....​

This is a good setup, but the ammo will dictate what its capable of.... Better working out to 100 first as far as long range, then see later on how it might be at 300... youll also need a seriously good spotting scope and spotter to at least see where your shots are to dial in properly... you wont mostlikely be able to do yourself...

I have one of these mark 2s. I get nothing but light strikes from it now. It was accurate ish.

Savage has been unhelpful with it.

2 cents.

 

[Buck1950]

I have one of these mark 2s. I get nothing but light strikes from it now. It was accurate ish.

Savage has been unhelpful with it.

2 cents.

Bile, Have you contacted Savage in LAKEFIELD? I've found them very helpful. Savage USA is also good but you might have to ship out the rifle. Have you called either place, or just emails? What ammo are you using? If the headspace is too great, you might get light strikes - have you checked that? Does the bolt close really easily - that could indicate large headspace. Have you taken the bolt apart and Cleaned it ? Often there is Manufacturing Grease dried up inside that needs to be cleaned out. The MKIIs are pretty good for "Low-cost rifles", likely waaayy better than a ruger for about half the cost. I have a B22-FV that's lots better, but they cost ca $500+ nowadays. Still less $$ than a CZ or Annie.

 

[Lefty Dick]

I definitely disagree.
300 yards is very attainable with a 22LR.
Not your average 10/22 maybe but any decent bolt action and optic (20-30moa cant helps) and u shud be able to have plenty of fun at 300 yards.

22LR is almost ALL about the ammo.
Federal blue box, Winchester wildcat, American Eagle, and the like are not what you want here.

Eley, RWS, SK, and Lapua are what you are looking for. Preferably subsonic.
Norma Tac-22 (made by RWS) is pretty good for the price too.

Do NOT be intimidated or allow anyone to dissuade you.

My 7 year old shoots his 22 to 300 routinely.

I use CZ457’s but they are in my bad books these days for gun grab reasons.

Folks like the Tikka 1x and I would lean towards the Springfield 2020 if i was to get another today. Even. Savage Mark II will get u out there.

Have fun!!!

Where did I say it wasn’t doable?

All I did was suggest he start closer, and consider the outlay in time and $ it may require.

 

[Lefty Dick]

LOL! You need to get out there in life and have some FUN and new experiences. I was shooting out to 500m on a regular basis with my 22. Not at the gongs, because you don't even hear them or see them move at that distance. Just aiming for the rocks on the berm, or the orange clays. Pretty amazing with the consistency you can get out there when there is no wind to deal with.




Aint that the truth. Last I was using the anny 1727, and had another round in before the bullet made it out to 500 m, forget about the sound coming back.

I shoot plenty of .22 RF at extended distances like 300 yards, all I was suggesting is the OP consider what it takes to get to his wanted distance.

 

[bdb.hunting]

So there are plenty of options from full customs, semi customs, and factory rifles!

PRS has done some great things for the rimfire world as far as accessories, barrels, and support to reach out long distances with 22lr.

I’ve hit gongs at 200m with a cheap savage 64 semi auto back in the day by walking it in with a spotter.

so doable by all means with an affordable setup but there are ways to help yourself.

Canted scope rail, or Burris rings with inserts. Scope with a good amount of elevation travel. Quality ammunition that shoots consistently in your rifle.

I have two setups that can touch 300 yard gongs on a good day. T1X with a 30 MOA rail and a Ruger 10/22 CSC with a built in 20 MOA rail (I believe it’s 20 but can check later.)

If I put the right optic on either rifle it will repeatedly hit the targets.

Really comes down to budget.

B

 

[Steiner]

based on what?

I thought there was info here and Runkle on youtube commenting that they have back tracked on participating. Or am i wrong?

 

[doo925]

CZ457 LRP.

 

[I Dont Care About You]

CZ with match chambers get rave reviews.

And CZ was helping take our guns away, so there is that too.

I'd say CZ but can't recommend them anymore for their participation in the gun grab.

THIS. Lets not forget this.

I thought there was info here and Runkle on youtube commenting that they have back tracked on participating. Or am i wrong?

CZ has done next to nothing to dispel this notion. They need to be A LOT more certain that their subsidiary is not helping to take our guns away.