Gentlemen,
I'm not trying to start a legal firestorm / pissing match here, but I have been wondering about this for a while.
The legal length for a "non-restricted" firearm in Canada is 26". It doesn't matter if you have a 2" barrel and 24" stock (as long as it came from the manufacturer that way), or a 22" barrel and a 2" stock.
Suppose you buy a handgun and replace the barrel with a MUCH longer one. One that now meets the overall length requirement of 26".
I.E. Glock 17 with a 24" barrel. It would be long enough to meet the overall length conditions of an "unrestricted" firearm.
Opinions?
I'm not trying to start a legal firestorm / pissing match here, but I have been wondering about this for a while.
The legal length for a "non-restricted" firearm in Canada is 26". It doesn't matter if you have a 2" barrel and 24" stock (as long as it came from the manufacturer that way), or a 22" barrel and a 2" stock.
Suppose you buy a handgun and replace the barrel with a MUCH longer one. One that now meets the overall length requirement of 26".
I.E. Glock 17 with a 24" barrel. It would be long enough to meet the overall length conditions of an "unrestricted" firearm.
Opinions?


















































