What about barrels?

alberta tactical rifle

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Business Member
Rating - 100%
114   0   1
Location
calgary alberta
IF a Canadian maker were to start to making AR15 barrels, in stainless, lets say with REAL 5R rifling in assorted lengths.
What would the preferred twist rates be???
And what lengths???
Seeking intel for possible future project only at this time.
Thanks for your input.
 
Not really interested in the SS bull barrels.

A CHF 1/7 proofed/MPI shorter than 16" would be awesome though. Maybe a 10.5"? M4? I dunno... I haven't gotten that far into my next build to think about barrels beyond that.
 
16" midlength carbine 7" twist.

Thanks for putting out this research. ATR is a great organization trying to help our AR addiction! Let's step up and support our CGNutz sponsors !! :D
 
16" mid-weight Recce type, 1:8 or 1:7 Twist

+1

Medium profile 11.5" would be fantastic as well. Regardless of what you end up offering, ensure that a standard front sight base is at least an option. Not really a fan of gas blocks held on with set screws.

ETA: Bead blasting as an option would be good.
 
My $.02


You'd be best served to ignore the middle of the road market. There is no sense in wasting time and effort repeating work that the average Joe would be just as well served buying for one of the importers. Leave the plain profiled or M4 profiled 16+ inch barrels alone.

Your best sellers would likely be the heavy barrelled 16-20 inch guns with picatinny railed gas blocks, or the sub 14 inch fun lengths.
 
frankly I am looking for a 18" rifle length gas tube to make an SPR clone.... now you would also need to make some ops inc flash hiders too :)

i think if you built 16" midlength, 14.5" carbine length and shorter you would sell what you brought in.... your making the lowers, why not assemble some complete guns and put them out there... with the shortage people ARE paying a premium and you could sell guarenteed accuracy fairly easy.
 
1:7 twist.
Pinned gas blocks or sight bases - picatinny gas blocks are a waste of effort, and set screwed blocks are crap.
I would think 11", 14", 16" & 18" would safely cover the market here. I think the market is saturated with match and regular quality 20 inchers, and kind of doubt longer stuff would generate enough interest in .223 to warant making them.
 
This surprises me too, I figured 1 in 8 would have been a preferred twist so I am glad I asked.

I guess I should then ask why the 7 twist?.

1:7 shoots just about every .224 bullet under the sun. 1:8 is still a close 2nd and will shoot 99% of what people will put through them. I'm not sure who buys 1:9 twist barrels :onCrack:
 
1/9 Twist Rationale

In regard to why most manufacturers go 1/9...

dangertree said:
I think they would tell you that most ammo being shot isn't the 'good stuff'. Most of it is cheap 55gn FMJ and 62gn surplus, the ammo where I personally find more fliers with my 1/7, and I presume, so do the manufacturers. I can speak for Stag Arms take on this, because I asked the CEO exactly this question, and his response was "Because I don't want to have to spend my days on the phone explaining to shop owners why their customers rifles won't group well with the most common ammunition they sell." This is also when I was told that their 1/9 is closer to 1/8.5 and should stabilize most any mag loadable ammo.

The vast vast vast majority of 223 ammo commercially sold in the USA is <62gns, and the 1/9 is superior there, that's why almost everyone offers the bulk of their lineup in 1/9.

As Leg said, the US Military went with 1/7 due to the length of the tracer round, not due to better accuracy with 62gn M855 ball ammo. I know we have a few customers who put 20" 1/9 uppers on their C7 lowers for matches, as they find they shoot C77 ball more consistently.

Taken from here http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=276434&highlight=twist
 
Back
Top Bottom