what Vince seems to be implying is that we didn't submit our new request on time.
I think that he's keying in on the grace period, not the descion itself. In any event, posts like his certainly don't make it very clear...
what Vince seems to be implying is that we didn't submit our new request on time.
Nothing in the replies make any sense what so ever.
Something smells a tad rank.

After shooting IPSC for 24 years, why can these dolts that don't like the rules just go play with themselves. When someone does not like a rule just ignore it or change it. In Canada we are supposed to play by the IPSC rules, they are published and used the world over except for the USPSA and Canada? You can argue the USPSA rules that do not conform to the world and they make little sense, most are driven by the gun companies and after market suppliers, do virtually anything you want to a production gun on the inside but careful about the holster you use. If Canada had the balls in the beginning to go with the world rules we would all have 126mm mags in standard. Exceptions only get you into trouble when you travel to the big world out there. USPSA started the problem by not wanting to comply to the rules and Canada the sheep followed suit in some areas. Anyone wanting Canada to join the USPSA opens a whole other can of worms, the USPSA is not perfect The whole point of the rules is safety and a level playing field for all,exemptions will only cause trouble down the line as noted in this thread.
Nice second post. Run along....
Just because someone hasn't added hundreds of replies to "Girls with Guns" means their opinion is less valid and their comments ignored?
Just because someone hasn't added hundreds of replies to "Girls with Guns" means their opinion is less valid and their comments ignored? Previous poster provides some food for thought about where the exceptions have led us. I may not agree, but that doesn't mean I'm going to belittle his thoughts on the matter or dismiss them out of hand.
We have some issues that require more than just #####ing and complaining, we need to develop some solutions. This means working together, and hearing input from all parties concerned, even if we don't agree with what they have to say.
Just because someone hasn't added hundreds of replies to "Girls with Guns" means their opinion is less valid and their comments ignored? Previous poster provides some food for thought about where the exceptions have led us. I may not agree, but that doesn't mean I'm going to belittle his thoughts on the matter or dismiss them out of hand.
We have some issues that require more than just #####ing and complaining, we need to develop some solutions. This means working together, and hearing input from all parties concerned, even if we don't agree with what they have to say.
After shooting IPSC for 24 years, why can these dolts that don't like the rules just go play with themselves. When someone does not like a rule just ignore it or change it. In Canada we are supposed to play by the IPSC rules, they are published and used the world over except for the USPSA and Canada? You can argue the USPSA rules that do not conform to the world and they make little sense, most are driven by the gun companies and after market suppliers, do virtually anything you want to a production gun on the inside but careful about the holster you use. If Canada had the balls in the beginning to go with the world rules we would all have 126mm mags in standard. Exceptions only get you into trouble when you travel to the big world out there. USPSA started the problem by not wanting to comply to the rules and Canada the sheep followed suit in some areas. Anyone wanting Canada to join the USPSA opens a whole other can of worms, the USPSA is not perfect The whole point of the rules is safety and a level playing field for all,exemptions will only cause trouble down the line as noted in this thread.
The whole point of the rules is safety and a level playing field for all,exemptions will only cause trouble down the line as noted in this thread.
So single stack 1911 users now have only 8 or 9 rounds instead of 11 like double stack shooters? How is that level? ...
did we loose the bullet weight one aswell? I feel sorry for anyone who stocked up on bullets, that will be a bigger kick in the nutz then buying new mags.



























