I was pointing out that in Gatehouse's deer story the bullet traversed the length of a deer and from that he assumes it will go deep enough into an eland to get to the vitals. In order for the bullet in Clark's story to go lengthwise through the deer had to be shot from the front, the same angle I shot the eland with. Clearly the almost identical bullet with near identical ballistics didnt penetrate far enough on the eland.
I've said this to you before, if you want to shoot an eland with a 165gr bullet because your expertise says it's a good idea, go ahead. Clearly being a professional you have vast experience and nothing could possibly go wrong, I don't have that degree confidence in my abilities. I shot a very big eland with what I thought was lots of gun, a nice clean hit and it just trotted away. The eland wasn't recovered and survived to rejoin the herd. I haven't said it can't be done with the load you are planning, just that it's a stupid idea.
So again take your girlfriend, shoot an eland, come back, show us the pics
and tell us again how we are wrong and you are right...enjoy.