Twist to Sask Hunters Fined

casterpollox

CGN frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Location
Saskatchewan
OOOOOPPPPPSSSS


Two men facing Wildlife Act charges sue Saskatchewan gov't



REGINA -- Two men facing Wildlife Act charges are suing the provincial government and three government employees after a press release sent out last month said the men had received hefty fines — even though in actuality they had yet to enter a plea to the charges.

Lyle Helland and Brian Bardal, both from the Assiniboia area, were two of four men charged late last spring for alleged illegal hunting activities, the result of a lengthy investigation by conservation officers.

At the time of the charges being laid, a Saskatchewan Environment spokesman said the four men had been investigated as the result of public complaints, which involved alleged poaching of trophy white-tailed and mule deer antlers.

On Feb. 9, Saskatchewan Environment issued a news release to a number of media outlets — including the Leader-Post — stating that Helland and Bardal had pleaded guilty to Wildlife Act charges at Assiniboia Provincial Court and were subsequently fined a combined $36,400. Details from that news release were made public by a number of media outlets, both within and outside Saskatchewan.

The problem was Helland and Bardal had not actually pleaded guilty and therefore had not received any penalty. According to their statement of claim filed in Regina on Tuesday, both men continue to face the Wildlife Act and Wildlife Regulations charges — Helland 14 and Bardal seven — and intend to plead not guilty when they appear in Assiniboia court Thursday.

The claim, which contains information that hasn’t been proven in court, contends Helland and Bardal suffered blows to their reputations through the erroneous news release that they say made them out to be “criminals,” “untrustworthy,” and “dishonest.” They further claim the news release breached their Charter right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

“We do not understand how people can be convicted without even having pled, so now in substance in the court of public opinion, they’re already convicted …,” said Kevin Mellor, lawyer for the men on both the civil and Wildlife Act matters, on Wednesday. “My clients have materially suffered as a result of that mistake.”

Mellor called this type of situation “highly unusual.”

A Saskatchewan Environment spokesperson was contacted but said the department isn’t commenting at this time.

The men are asking for $120,000 each in general and punitive damages, as well as pre-judgment interest, legal costs and any other remedy the court may find fit.

hpolischuk@leaderpost.canwest.com
 
No, it doesn't suck, and I find difficulty in repeating that childish phrase, "It sucks!"
The original announcement, stating they were convicted and fined, when in fact they had not even been in court, is a terrible breach of their privacy and charter of rights. Completely disregarding whatever offence they may, or may not be guilty of, they are innocent until proven guilty.
They deserve every cent they may be granted.
 
I don't like to see people getting away with things in the court system, but that was definetly a Class A SNAFU. They are absolutely justified in making the best of the situation now.
 
Big Time Fail. That's why you don't release information about court dispositions. They're available through the Court Registry and are public record...no reason to try to toot your own horn by firing off a press release stating obvious.
 
Well if our justice system still made any sense at all the outcome would be something like this if the defendants are found guilty.

Helland and Bardal(plantiff) versus crown (defendant) award to plantiff of $120,000.00 each.

Crown (plantiff)versus Helland and Bardall court sentence to be loss of hunting rights and any seized equipment plus a fine of $36,400.00 each and a charitable donation to a registered cause of $83,600.00 each.

Why should they be allowed to make any money out of this and the government should pay for their screw up to.
 
Last edited:
Why should they be allowed to make any money out of this and the government should pay for their screw up to.

Its not to make money. It is to replace money they would/could have made had the goverment not painted them as poachers. Which they are not until proven guilty.

Would you hire/ advance someone who had just been branded
“criminals,” “untrustworthy,” and “dishonest.”
 
Or someone in the government screwed up on purpose so the two will end up with money...in order to pay any fines that may come down the road.

Just how does a press release get made with those fine amounts when it never occured?????
 
Man, What I would give a be a fly on the wall in that govment office. With all of them looking at each other saying "oppsie". Thank god they are getting sued so they can't cover this up.
 
This is absolutely scandalous, first time I have heard of this.

And what I find scandalous is NOT the alleged charges, but the actions of the government in regards to the accused.

It is MOST refreshing to see that the point of view apparently prevailing in this thread is that the men are innocent until proven guilty, which is a cherished right that our forebears fought to achieve and protect. It was not so long ago in this very website that dozens of posters were pillorying a couple of CGN members who had been ACCUSED, but not even TRIED yet, for alleged poaching offences. The crowds were sreaming for blood, and a few persons such as myself who pointed out the Canadian "presumption of innocence" were roundly castigated.

I am still POed about that one..........

So I do hope that justice is served in BOTH matters here, both the original charges (based on their merit) and the lawsuit by these folks who APPEAR to have been unjustly treated.

Doug
 
Can anyone say frivolous??? Why do they deserve $160,000?? For what? It was a mistake. Don't get me wrong, personal rights are the most cherished and important aspect of our society. but really.... $160,000? Personaly, I think a front page story, in every newspaper that carried the story, stating that a mistake was made and that these two defandants have yet to state their case in court would be sufficient. Maybe I'm just naive but how exactly does a misprinted article stating that someone plead guilty when they didn't, cause you to loose money? I think it's streach of the imagination, and complete BS... But thats just my opinion....
 
Back
Top Bottom