Im sure this will be a highly contested subject...
When i was a kid my old man used to hunt deer and moose with his 30-30. he took me on deer hunts, but was always gone for too long moose hunting for me to attend because it was during the school season. Now, that being said it seems as though everyone these days craps on the 30-30 as an underpowered lil' brother of todays large bore rifles. "only good for medium game" some say. "Bounces off the hide of big game" say others. While I've also heard/read stories of people effectively hunting much larger animals such as bear and cariboo with it.
So what's the deal then? Are people resigned to bigger is better? In 100 years will people be saying "that 303 british wouldn't be enough gun for mule deer, ya need a 50bmg AT LEAST!" Or is it as my father, and nearly every other hunter 50-100 years ago believed. That a 30-30 used within it's effective range (under 100m) will effectively kill anything North America has to offer... and then some?
When i was a kid my old man used to hunt deer and moose with his 30-30. he took me on deer hunts, but was always gone for too long moose hunting for me to attend because it was during the school season. Now, that being said it seems as though everyone these days craps on the 30-30 as an underpowered lil' brother of todays large bore rifles. "only good for medium game" some say. "Bounces off the hide of big game" say others. While I've also heard/read stories of people effectively hunting much larger animals such as bear and cariboo with it.
So what's the deal then? Are people resigned to bigger is better? In 100 years will people be saying "that 303 british wouldn't be enough gun for mule deer, ya need a 50bmg AT LEAST!" Or is it as my father, and nearly every other hunter 50-100 years ago believed. That a 30-30 used within it's effective range (under 100m) will effectively kill anything North America has to offer... and then some?



















































